Just so people are aware, shinigamiookamiryuu is one of the accounts of an infamous troll who claims to be from Pitcairn known as Tynan Laird who has a long internet history of trolling behaviours, creepy comments being made towards members of an internet forum who are minors, defending CP, Nazis, impersonating people and other abhorrent things, such as telling a trans person to shoot up a school after calling them an anti-trans slur.
When I pointed this out to them, they attempted to sealion and gaslight about it.
Their modus operandi is this:
- They’ll say/do reprehensible things.
- When they get reprehension for things they’ll say to evidence of those things “it’s fake”, “it’s slander”, “you can’t read my intentions” or “you’re misinterpreting everything”.
- They paint themselves as a targeted victim.
Rinse and repeat.
They’ll try and avoid any accountability whatsoever and other people have pointed this out before. They like to portray themselves as a victim who is being targeted for no reason.
They are a highly manipulative person. For instance, they will claim they “apologized” for calling the trans person a slur, as if this excuses their behaviour, saying they don’t know language well, while deliberately leaving out the fact they told them to go and do what the Nashville shooter (who was trans) did, and that they, by their own admission, only apologized after others (quote) “convinced” them to. They’ll also send themselves anonymous asks to their Tumblr account to concern-troll and they have also stolen women’s selfies to use for their fake internet persona.
The reason OP’s posts are difficult to understand is because they’re trying to word the drama they’ve gotten themselves involved in in a way that makes them look innocent or misunderstood. Their main account is shinigamiookamiryuu, and they will deny that they have alts and gaslight people when the evidence is right there for people to see (such as them admitting they own the sockpuppet account and then denying it when it’s most convenient, and more recently, accidentally referring to a comment they posted on their main Lemmy account in the first person on their Reddit sockpuppet account instead of the usual “my friend”). They will lie straight through their teeth hoping people fall for it.
They will call it all “slander”, hoping that people believe them and don’t investigate further. When this excuse doesn’t work they’ll try to gaslight everyone into believing they’re “misinterpreting everything” and they’re just a misunderstood individual who is being targeted for no reason. They have accounts all over the internet and have been banned from places because they aren’t who they say they are.. Their shinigamiookamiryuu account’s username was stolen from someone on DeviantArt who called them out for the things about minors and this is something they do once anyone exposes them or calls them out, among other things such as stalking and doxing. Administrators of Bulbagarden recently perma-banned them because of concerning off-site conduct.
They have had posts removed and have been banned multiple times from Lemmy for trolling, as the modlog shows. They locked their own post after people called them out for saying Elon Musk’s Nazi salute “has been debunked though”.
If you want to go down a huge rabbit hole, there’s a person on DeviantArt who wrote up a long post detailing their antics, complete with lots of evidence in the form of links.
I’m posting this here because this isn’t the first time OP has posted here to make vaguely worded, borderline incomprehensible posts relating to dramas they’ve gotten into (them primarily using a sockpuppet account to vaguely post about dramas their friend they get into/them getting called out for something or banned from somewhere is something they also do on Reddit) and I feel like I should provide some much needed clarification and context.
I don’t care what someone says to me, wishing death on someone for an internet fight is immature and frankly pathetic.
Oh and anyone trying to give Elon the benefit of the doubt is either a cryptofascist or a useful idiot.
And that’s why I apologized at the time. And he forgave me. Sincerity in an apology is subjective, because whether someone feels slighted is itself a matter of how they feel, and whether he (the person I apologized to) accepts the apology (and whether he withdraws his forgiveness somewhere down the line, which I would also accept) is his call, not the word of someone who is a part of an omnipresent campaign against me.
He is very principled when it comes to Luigi and people expressing support…
But when he wants people dead, it ain’t no thing.
Pathetic bootlicker
Holy shit. That’s the same person who raised a whole lot of stink on YTPB because we wouldn’t give them a platform to post their…well, best way to put it is “fan-fiction defense”…about being featured in YTPB.
I knew there was something disconcertingly “off” about this person.
I didn’t connect the dots in this post until I saw the dailymotion vids!
dailymotion vids
Pretty unique
Never seen it used this way until now, ngl
Same, quite innovative
So just because you didn’t have a good feeling about me before means the unverifiable (because they’re not true) things that would mark me as “off” are suddenly plausible?
Everything I was doing with that “stink” I was doing based on your instructions. You told me to take an issue elsewhere. I did. You told me to then go back and reformat my complain. I did. And then you told me to say something you could put up front for everyone to see. I did. And when you complained I broke a rule in the first place, the rule you said I broke did not exist, as Blaze can attest.
So just because you didn’t have a good feeling about me before means the unverifiable (because they’re not true) things that would mark me as “off” are suddenly plausible?
Note, that I didn’t say any of that.
did not exist, as Blaze can attest.
@[email protected] attest, damnit! Attest!
You might be new here (which is the whole point, you came here just to slander and campaign against me unfoundedly), but aside from the things I already prove you wrong on, which is just about everything you’re saying here, you should be aware that, one, this place is only for fediverse-related occurrences, and two, giving yourself thumbs ups is against the rules.
This OP does not calculate with the modding decision here:
https://thebrainbin.org/m/[email protected]/t/520433/Modlog-Will-not-tolerate-blind-alignment-with-Luigi-Mangione
Wow.
That’s some top tier, horrifically insane manipulation and gas lighting.
‘Dogs can smell DID’.
Nah pretty sure that’s completely impossible nonsense, but as a person who’s dated someone with DID, who pulled maybe 20% to 30% of the same insane gaslighting, manipulative bullshit on me and their ‘friends’ during the year-ish I dated them as this person has…
I think maybe I can smell it a bit here.
EDIT: Seeing as this person is a mod on lemmy, you might wanna post this to yepowertrippinbastards on the dbzero /db0 instance, OP, though you may have to modify the post a bit to show instances of mod abuse on lemmy with modlogs as receipts.
Nah pretty sure that’s completely impossible nonsense
If it’s gaslighting to say people can speak for the intentions of another person without their permission, that would be on par with claiming any headcanon you want in a TV show is canon or that you can “interpret” someone’s consent in a consent-mandated task. It’s not gaslighting or manipulation, it’s simple courtesy.
Everywhere I go, I am only one person. Always have been. Nothing aside from speculation says anything here is untrue. Unless speculation is suddenly sufficient as proof in a court of law.
YTPB is not suitable for this sort of thing. I would have to remove it as off-topic
God that thing keeps delivering
I don’t really care enough to get into the entire rabbit-hole, but I am critical enough to look into it briefly. I saw this exchange:
You forgot to mention to the people here that you also told them to go and do what the Nashville school shooter (who was trans) did
Here is a challenge for you. Point to where I said anything about a shooter.
It’s right at the end where you say it.
[Screenshot including at the end “do what the person in Nashville did, minus the parts you’re too weak to do, because that is so you”]
Again, point to where I said anything about a shooter. Do it.
What I said at the time to my friend was ungraceful. I apologized. We made up. We have been friends for years ever since then, and he has condemned people lately for using what he says is proof taken without his authorization.
The point wasn’t that you were accused of using the word “shooter.” The point was that you told them to blah blah blah, which you did. Focusing on the word is just absurd. Changing the subject from “did I say this terrible thing” to “has the person forgiven me for saying this terrible thing” and acting like the second thing make the first thing untrue or something, makes you look dishonest and defensive about past bad behavior.
If you messed up in the past, just say so. I know nothing about the whole situation, but the one part of it I examined in any detail (1) confirms the one accusation I chose to look at and (2) makes you look like your reaction to being criticized for something is more or less in line with how this person says you react.
Changing the subject from “did I say this terrible thing” to “has the person forgiven me for saying this terrible thing” and acting like the second thing make the first thing untrue or something, makes you look dishonest and defensive about past bad behavior.
…as opposed to what? As opposed to something I did staying with me forever? Most people have done something terrible in their life before. Many of these people compensate and make up for them. If you were to call it changing the subject to point out that something has been dealt with for years, it implies that there is no use in improvement.
Maybe the very fact you haven’t read up on it all (nobody ever does, ever) explains why you think I haven’t said I messed up in the past. Maybe do what most people don’t do and read up on everything before sending me those accusations, since bias based on a brief reading is still biase. Also maybe consider that doxxing people is explicitly against the rules, unless you support that.
…as opposed to what? As opposed to something I did staying with me forever?
As opposed to linking to an example of you apologizing for the past bad behavior, and saying “yes, that was a terrible thing, and I shouldn’t have said it.”
That is the correct response. Not “Here is a challenge for you. Point to where I said anything about a shooter.”
And I say again, if you had looked through everything, you would know that I have done that.
People here are terrifying.
People here are terrifying.
Nobody is forcing you to be here.
In the past three days, two of your Discord friends and one of your Reddit friends, two of whom are known here, have teamed up and convinced me, for reasons I will explain, to provide you with an apology that one might say you deserve.
That’s your defense of yourself?
What the fuck, man. I’m not sure how these things play out in your head but they are not making your case successfully.
There’s a natural tendency when someone criticizes your behavior, to take it as an “attack” which you have to defend against. To stand up for yourself and say no, that’s wrong, I’m not a piece of shit, stop talking to me like I am. The thing is that people who do that too much, who feel slighted every time someone says they did something bad and they have to vigorously jump to their own defense about it because no one else will do it, are sometimes some of the most insufferable and pain in the ass people to deal with on the planet. Because they never did anything wrong. They shot your dog? Well that dog was dangerous. They impregnated your underage sister? They haven’t paid their share of rent for six months? “Why is this always about ME, don’t you see I’m the real victim here, what the fuck, how dare you, I thought we were friends…”
Dude, I still don’t know up from down about this whole situation. I just know the little bit I have seen. But what I’ve seen is pretty unmistakable. I am sure you have other parts to your character that are shining and good, and I understand being in a place where everyone’s ganging up on you. Please then, take this in the spirit of tough love from which it is intended, based on my incomplete picture: Grow the fuck up. Own your mistakes. Stop making excuses. If you really feel so bad that you told a trans friend of yours to commit a school shooting, then instantly own it, apologize, don’t “stand up for” the bad behavior or try to mount some kind of a defense about it.
If you separate the bad behavior from yourself, firmly and completely, then there’s no need to get defensive about anything. That was who I am in the past, and I’ve gotten better since then. If that’s still you, or part of you, then fucking stop it. Today. There is absolutely no need to give that part of yourself the slightest defense or kind treatment.
Lenny is she/her
Yes, that’s my defense of myself. I did feel the guilt. Being “convinced” to apologize does not necessitate otherwise, it just means I had some talks with some people about it.
And there lies much of this problem. People look way too much into specific wording, either overly looking into it or not considering it enough, hence this long lecture towards me.
Ironically I often adapt my wording to accommodate for this. Not that even this always works. The apology still came from a genuine part of me and I did mean it.
You are defending an individual (the OP) whose efforts I can prove, absolutely prove, are omnipresent as they just want to spite me as much as possible and want to make things miserable however they can.
There are, as you said, things that inherently don’t fix a misdeed. There are, however, also things that are inherently excessive. And in looking at the original discussion starter’s efforts, you are looking the latter in the eye.
Without malice, I don’t think you are capable of understanding what is happening here. I think you should take that to heart and try to understand what that would mean.
I understand several aspects of what is happening here.
I understand that the people who are trying to spread this are, literally (and I can prove undeniably), dedicating themselves to being spiteful to me, and that the person slandering me above registered yesterday just to do that.
I understand slandering is against the rules, but doxxing is much more against the rules, and both are involved here, unless you support all of these just to get a point across.
I understand that people can do terrible things, and that they can make up for those things, and that they can change, because the universe is not biased towards negativity.
I understand that, in a world where shame lives with someone forever and apologies don’t matter even when the person a misdeed is to explicitly forgives them, improvement is useless and without incentive.
I understand that said person has even gone on record as denouncing the people who are after me, not only due to the excess but also the fact that the proof that is being used is being used without his consent.
And I understand that nuance exists and that not everything is as it seems, that not every piece of evidence is honest (because evidence can be faked) and that not everything said by the masses is true just because it’s said by the masses.
A part of the basis of the accusations against me is that every last one of these are frequently ignored.
