• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Lotta coulds, ifs and mights in this breathless koolaid-drinker’s puff piece (actually he’s probably just a shill). Lotta rendered images and animations. Lotta lack of anything tangible. Lotta totally irrelevant misdirection in the bottom half of the puff piece.

    This isn’t a news piece. Nothing new has been done with this idea. It’s basically an ad (for vaporware). The headline is technically misleading, as no such thing has been done yet.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lmao don’t be so dramatic.

      It just takes building enough energy to launch the object of whatever mass.

      It’s a mathmatical equation that will be solved by someone someday.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Do you struggle with reading comprehension?

        I didn’t say anything about whether this concept was viable from a physics standpoint.

        I said that the article is a puff piece (which it is) and probably a paid advertisement, and that the headline claims that a thing has happened which has not actually happened.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It would work fine in a vacuum, e.g. on the moon. Unfortunately, on earth we have a thick atmosphere to deal with. Orbits are about going sideways VERY fast. If you try and plough through the atmosphere at 7km/second it creates a LOT of heat, and uses a LOT of energy. You also can’t just lob a satellite up. It will need to circularise its orbit, so you need to log an engine and fuel too.

        Basically, it’s viable as a technological idea, but not on earth.

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “sends” in a headline means one thing to most people. They should have said “may one day send” if they wanted to be accurate.

        In mice.