• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    they most certainly will lose furries

    That’s the objective

    people who support others’ rights to be themselves as customers

    The number of people who would boycott a restaurant over furries being banned is going to round down to zero.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The number of people who would boycott a restaurant over furries being banned is going to round down to zero.

      As would my patience for arguing about stuff we can’t usefully quantify.

      Im not going to engage in that discussion.

      Anyway as someone else pointed out, this is likely completely fake.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I made a statement that they would lose more than just furries as customers. Which frankly is distinctly possible, if not probable. You made a separate claim that the number of people that would care about furries getting banned from a burger king would be very few. Which is not something you can prove, back up with any evidence or quantify is any real way. I refused to continue a discussion about how many people care about furries as it isn’t really saying anything about my original statement, which, again, was only that people would care.

          Also i get the impression you have a problem with furries. Based on the language you used. I may be wrong, but it doesnt seem likely.

          If you can remove your own personal bias from the conversation and talk less about your opinion that no one cares about furries and more about the fact that banning anyone from any service based on them being themselves is a foul act and one that in most circumstances would piss off more than just those in that subculture then we can talk.