- 4 Posts
- 8 Comments
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksOPto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•DeepSeek dropped the V3.1 WeightEnglish
0·10 months agoEverybody been rumoring about R2. So releasing this thing kinda unexpected
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksOPto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•When DeepSeek V4 and R2?English
0·10 months agoThe RL is so good grok changed it’s personality by changing small part of it’s system prompt
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksOPto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•When DeepSeek V4 and R2?English
0·10 months ago
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksOPto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•When DeepSeek V4 and R2?English
0·10 months agoThey got the whole Twitter database. It’s kinda the same with Gemini. But somehow Meta isn’t catching up, maybe their llama 4 architecture isn’t that stable to train.
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksOPto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•When DeepSeek V4 and R2?English
0·10 months agoIt changed after Grok 3
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•So image generation is where it's at?English
0·10 months agoNo, you can run sd, flux based model inside the koboldcpp. You can try it out using the original koboldcpp in google colab. It loads gguf model. Related discussion on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1gsdygl/koboldcpp_now_supports_generating_images_locally/
Edit: Sorry, I kinda missed the point, maybe I’m sleepy when writing that comment. Yeah, I agree that LLM need big memory to run which is one of it’s downside. I remember someone doing comparison that API with token based pricing is cheaper that to run it locally. But, running image generation locally is cheaper than API with step+megapixel pricing.
pepperfree@sh.itjust.worksto
LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works•So image generation is where it's at?English
0·10 months agoThere is koboldcp-rocm fork. Koboldcpp itself has basic image generation. https://github.com/YellowRoseCx/koboldcpp-rocm


Ah. Sorry, good thing I attached the related link.