He’ll only have himself to blame if he loses in November.
Utter fool.
He’ll only have himself to blame if he loses in November.
Utter fool.
Fascist fuck is then confused why he can’t scrape together enough votes to beat a felon.
No, turning away the Democrats from having killing as a policy is.
As you say, people are going going to die anyway “that’s just reality” and I have to vote for a fascist if I vote for anyone. May as well cast an Uncommitted and punish the party that should be anti-genocide but isn’t currently.
(I am one of the minorities that will be targeted by a GOP admin, btw)
I’m just following your logic and finding the action that has the best long-term effect.
People are going to die anyway, right? That’s just history, right?
If you’re looking for a point in history when there wasn’t someone getting hit by the trolley, you’ll be looking a while
Sounds like I should do what’s best to send a message to the Democrats in an effort to steer them away from being murderous then, since people are going to die either way and there is no winning with this single election. Thanks!
Just a reminder: voting for the lesser of two evils has not ever resulted in the Democratic party stopping their march to the extreme right right alongside the GOP, to the point now that in order to vote for the Democratic nominee one must accept that their vote goes to supporting a genocide.
Acceleration to genocide? My dipshit in Christ, there’s a full on genocide happening right now…
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It kind of illustrates why anarchy is as doomed to fail as libertarianism; note the use of force and the fact that the anarchists friends are not there defending him.
Anarchy cannot defend itself from organized outside threats because it is, by its nature, not organized, particularly in its use of force to confront fascism.
The obsession incels have with ensuring men are depicted as having a monopoly on physical violence has always been weird to me.
deleted by creator