but I prefer to base my opinion on actual facts.

A police officers statement is not a fact, and historically has always been a distortion to maximise victimisation of their institution and ensure they can inflict violence on the vulnerable.

Taking the narrative of a police officer positions you are very naive.

24 November 2025

I love your evidence is from before the trial, when the video showed in court finally showed it was the other way around and the police officer lied as the police always do.

they broke into a factory and attacked someone with a hammer

Just to be clear, the protestors were not using a hammer, but the person they attacked was attempting to brutalise them with a hammer, so its actually better to describe the situation as:

Protestors defend themselves when a police officer attacked them with a hammer.

Your wording is very weaselly.

Not much to do with an actual terrorist getting a few kicks in the head.

We are talking about the Golders Green attack, not whatever terror attack you are obsessed with. please stay on topic.

pearl clutching

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Sarah_Everard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Stephen_Lawrence

Nah, the “established process” is exactly what the police want you to use so the issue can be sandbagged for 30 years and the officers involved can slyly retire and never face any repercussions, and since it would’ve taken so long any reforms proposed can be dismissed as out of date. Calling out the police violently kicking someone in the head is exactly what we need our politicians doing.

Just because you want to offload the blame for the genocide entirely on the israelis, doesn’t change the reality that the UK has been complicit every step of the way for the eradication of 1000s of Palestinians families

The planes they damaged had nothing at all to do with israel.

Flying over Palestine and helping the israelis target missles at children sounds like a lot to do with israel.

The Campaign Against Antisemitism

Why should I trust this organisation when its leader tried to run protestors over in a van?

Labour peer Lord Katz

Mike Katz? Friend of Ivor Caplin and Liron Velleman?

Jury trial with a unanimous verdict is serious proof the 2000 Terror Act is not being used to how we were assured it was, and all those people who raised concerns at the time are eternally vindicated.

Do you agree that Israel is a country run by total murderous pieces of shit

First Israel is not a country, but an occupation on Palestine.

Secondly Israel is not just “run” by a total murderous piece of shit, its entire existence is that. If Nentanyahu disappears then every person who replaces him will be the same. The “opposition” to Nentanyahu opposes him because he isn’t committing ethnic cleansing fast enough.

A slave killing his master is not a crime, so the actions of Hamas are not either

Theres also the position that many of our current politicians don’t need to be paid off to support israel. Their racism and genocidal beliefs align with the goals of the occupation for free.

Given this event was one of the supposed major contributors to proscription, does the fact that a jury of the people not wanting to convict them mean the proscription might’ve been a bit overblown?

I’m sure its all in the past now and there aren’t any recent events over the last 2 years where this has happened again.

Absolutely horrifying

a policewoman with severe spinal injuries

Important to note the police officer attempted to brutalise someone.

current justice system relies on everyone being treated the same way

against the law

being held in custody awaiting trial.

Can only be held for 182 days, and we are way past that so the government is breaking the law here.

Ah so the rule of law doesn’t apply and we live in an authoritarian state.

And when 182 days of remand passes what happens?