• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 12th, 2024

help-circle
  • I’m confused about what you’re trying to argue. I don’t get what your example of a book about Mars is trying to say. You’ve completely missed the point of what I’m trying to say.

    You’re literally complaining to an internet stranger about being called a term which imo shows some level of endearment. You’re worrying about this comment thread likely because you don’t have a job.


  • Broski no need to get so pressed. What do you think fiction is? How would a young, impressionable audience, interpret this work?

    Works of fiction don’t exist in a vacuum. They are directly inspired and informed from the world we live in. In a similar vain, the impact of fiction does not exist in a vacuum. You don’t read a book and come away with no thoughts related to it. You don’t just throw away knowledge like that. If anything fiction works directed at children have an outsized impact on how we perceive the world compared to the space they occupy in literature.


  • ion know why you saying “again” like you made a big point of it being a children’s book (you didn’t). I’m just saying I don’t like media like this. It feels like they’re delegitimizing research that is already brushed off by society as not useful compared to something in a stem field.

    We can have different opinions lol


  • Ehh idk about this take. I agree with the article that there are some commercial historical mediums like the History Channel that interpret the past in an absurd/almost malicious way. However modern archaeology does a really good job of finding out how objects from the past were used and how people interacted with their environment. A toilet is not really gonna be up for debate as for what its use was. Historical text, fecal remains, toilets looking pretty similar for the past thousand years, is gonna tell you it’s a toilet.

    The notion of our interpretation of the past being completely flawed is kinda true if it was like the 1950s and we were talking about non-western cultures from a western perspective.




  • alcibiades@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlCultural enrichment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Smtn smtn reading comprehension skills or sum shit

    Someone who’s committing a genocide isn’t boutta say “we’re committing a genocide” unless they believe they’re the master race like Israelis or Nazis. I don’t see how the Chinese gov targeting a specific demographic doesn’t fall into the definition 😭

    Also I’m not “clearly intentionally misinterpreting [you] in bad faith” We’re on a social media platform retard this isn’t a court case where your character is on trial. I’m gonna say shit to make you mad.

    Genocide is bad- why are you trying to devalue the struggle of the Uyghur people?


  • alcibiades@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlCultural enrichment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Also bro you sound like an 8th grader who thinks they’re the shit cause they watched a YouTube video about Mao. You talk all pseudo intellectual and try to use modifiers like “I concur” as if that strengthens your argument somehow. It doesn’t and it makes you sound dumb and like you have no ground to stand on.

    Go touch some grass you loser


  • alcibiades@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlCultural enrichment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Good intel on Israel, thanks?

    Let me make sure I’m reading this right, but the only way for you to accept a modern day genocide if the perpetrator of the genocide comes out with the same statements as Israeli leaders? That’s awfully narrow and rather off topic tbh.

    The UN is reporting that the “anti-terrorist” laws in China are being abused in order to target a specific group of people and make their lives horrible. But I guess since their genocide is under the guise of “anti-terrorism” and China’s Minister of Defense didn’t call Uyghurs animals it doesn’t count.

    And what “fabrication” are you talking about. Are you trying to deny that the Uyghurs aren’t being targeted?

    For one condition could you provide a source that shows how Uyghurs are living perfectly peaceful lives without any genocidal intentions against them.


  • alcibiades@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlCultural enrichment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Read the UN’s definition of genocide and tell me this doesn’t fit the bill.

    Why are you trying to argue the semantics of what’s happening to the Uyghurs? It’s a brain dead thing to argue and is also as you say “moving the goalposts” from your original claim which was “there is no genocide taking place.” + you’re wrong

    Get a grip man



  • alcibiades@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlCultural enrichment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Bro did you even read the wiki article you linked, idiot. It talks about how numerous agencies/new outlets confirmed his research that there exists an ongoing genocide, detention, and sterilization programs of Uyghurs. The article goes into detail on how Zenz is the target of multiple misinformation campaigns to cover up his research. However, it also notes that you are in part right because he is exaggerating the numbers. (At least your dense, mush brained ass got one part slightly right)

    From the UN’s Report on Xinjiang, 2022

    Serious human rights violations have been committed in XUAR… the underlying acts often directly or indirectly affect Uyghur and other predominantly Muslim communities

    The report goes onto state how Uyghur’s are placed in detention camps with terrible conditions where forced surgeries, sexual violence, and torture have been reported. (VIII, 145)

    Multiple times the report states Uyghur’s are being stripped of their liberties in the region.

    Why are you citing a source that doesn’t even reflect your claim 🤡 Learn to read, better luck next time