Sure they have a bias when they report on some issues but as far as there reporting on racist, fascist, terrorist, genocidal, china is concerned they have a pretty good track record. They also don’t self-censor when it comes to talking about china’s shittiness, so why shouldn’t I believe them.

There is not much written about jesus in his teenage years (the years that in our day and age typically correspond to university). It’s speculated he travelled widely and might have reached India, where he learned about Buddhism and Hinduism. There were contacts between the Mediterranean and India as far back as ancient Egyptian times, so it’s not impossible

Removed by mod

Yes now is the time especially wrt Iran and ruzzia. Irans proxies are significantly weakened in Syria and Lebanon. Russia also lost influence in Syria now that the freedom-loving people of Syria have risen up. Russia is also losing in Ukraine.

Either these countries buck up and accept the Rules Based Order or pay the consequences.

Lol, “media bias fact check”. MFBC is not a reliable source especially when it talks about Israel. They are merely a bunch of Anti-semites.

Anyone throwing around terms “Israeli propaganda” need to check themselves. It’s nothing more than an emotionally charged anti-Semitic dog whistle. It basically relies on this false stereotype that since Israel is a Jewish state, and Jewish people are inherently manipulative or deceitful, Israel must not be telling the truth. It is nothing more than the same anti-semitism used for centuries to marginalize and demonize Jews.

Try again you fascist piece of shit.

No, propaganda is propaganda. When something is so obviously false or manipulative that it doesn’t even need to be debunked, it’s not about me “not liking it.” It’s about recognizing that there’s a clear agenda behind it—an agenda that aims to distort reality, spread harmful ideas, and manipulate people for a specific purpose. Pointing out fascist propaganda isn’t about “feelings” quite the contrary it’s fascists and there propaganda who appeal to feelings while progressives and democratically minded people appeal to reality.

Unz.com is a right wing hate site. Why is it allowed here?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-unz-report/

https://www.adl.org/resources/news/ron-unz-controversial-writer-and-funder-anti-israel-activists

The owner effetively tried to support a lawsuit to re-segregate Harvard

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/6/23/affirmative-action-lawsuit-holocaust-denier/

And before OP says something like he’s just here to debate. No. Debates occur in good faith. Propaganda does not need to be “debated.” It needs to be silenced, shut down, and deplatformed.

This idea that we should engage with lies and distortions as though they are equal positions to be “discussed” or “debated” is part of the problem, not the solution. We’re wasting time trying to dissect and disprove fabricated nonsense when the truth is that propaganda is inherently malicious. It’s not about free speech or diversity of thought—it’s about manipulation, control, and the deliberate spread of falsehoods to push an agenda.

Propaganda against freedom is a form of stochastic terrorism. To even allow debate would poison the very spirit of free speech. Every time we try to “debate” fascists, bigots and propagandists we allow it to exist on some level, giving it the oxygen to spread further. Bigotry isn’t a legitimate point of view—it’s a weapon designed to confuse, mislead, and divide people for the benefit of oporessoes. The moment we try to reason with it, we’re legitimizing it, giving it space to grow and infect minds.

A lot hopefully

I mean it’s pretty much our version of the BBC.

No, it’s funded by Congress, but that hardly means anything.

You need to go learn what editorial independence is. Journalists for RFA aren’t being sentenced to 3 generations of there family being out into concentration camps for disagreeing with the US govt.