Viewed from a historical perspective, it’s hard to see how the non-incombent didn’t have a really good advantage.

Hindsight can always be 20/20, and think a Buttigieg/Kelly ticket would have done a bit better. Buttigieg has been in charge of infrastructure, which I believe has been well run. He’s from the rust belt, and is more familiar with the working class vs the candidate with California Progressive with a DA background.

Ultimately though, I think the fault lies with the Democratic Party hijacking the primary process.

… you were saying?

deleted by creator

That’s kinda my understanding as well.

Brave/Firefox, although basically reskins, help keep ads at bay.

Kinda Brave/firefox can keep a lot of ads from bogging down things.

Damn. Cuts deep

This is a good take, I liken it to iodine in salt.

However, I worry about the effects of fluoride in groundwater. I don’t know if I should be too concerned about that per se, but I hear some plants hate it and that and it says in the ground for like forever.

I have plastic vases that can have them on them. Should take 3 days total

Have at. Ethical limitations apply as it’s a fairly new technology.

That’s a good take

This is my favorite comment btw. You win the thread

Interesting. Thanks for this

What a rude thing to say

Touch grass my European friend

Humans are overpopulated killing machines responsible for multiple extinctions….

I suppose you’re right.

I doubt I want to deal with a dead bird anyway.

You win the wisdom award. At least until I get bored and look up bird population parasite/diseases more in depth. Which I am unlikely to do.

No. Just no. Even prisoners are allowed outdoor privileges.

They’re interested, it’s a contained area, they are supervised. No.

I’ll counter with. I have a vet. I am interested in birdwatching and the cats are only outside supervised.

Good points.

I agree here. What if the bird population wasn’t endangered and considered a pest?

To be clear this is hypothetical. I haven’t done anything.