I never actually read it as a dig at “elderly” scientists but I think you’re right haha
Tbf I think it’s supposed to be understood more conceptually as seeing how many things we take for granted as being outside the realms of possibility have just not yet been tackled the right way.
No worries Yeah, sounded like a mixture of abstruse and obtuse 😂
They’re using walking (region alpha) vs biking (region beta) region as an analogy: “paradoxically” you’ll reach some further distances earlier, based on your choice of mode of transport. Which wouldn’t work in my case cause I’ll take the bike to the grocery store down the street. At any rate, your “choice” of defense mechanism influences your rate of recovery, is what they’re trying to say
Boy do I have a post for you!
👌🏻
Damn, good point. Couldn’t come up with a counter-example so just copy/pasted off of Wikipedia verbatim lmao Look out for tomorrow’s TIL when I look up what that type of locomotion is called lol
Fair enough, thought of converting it to 100k but was too lazy lol
Fair enough. The data is presented very weirdly. I changed the post
You’re very welcome
Also confer this very topical article
Oh noo I’m literally using Voyager to browse Lemmy
This goes in the “no shit” pile of research Still good to have confirmation
The main reason it went extinct…
You’ll have to elaborate on that
I’m glad you like my choice of words :3
Actually don’t know who that is haha
So according to my understanding, all of those alternate interpretations are just that, (mis)interpretations of the original galvanized iron applied to people. So I’d say your specific interpretation is not more wrong than any of those mentioned.
Lmaooo wasn’t me, or rather, seems to have been automatic
I’ve now removed the flag