I think it’s a toss up between “dog” and “new” as to which is the most disturbing.
I am having a tidy up of Communities/etc so quite a few will go. There’ll be some warning, but it will be done before August.
I think it’s a toss up between “dog” and “new” as to which is the most disturbing.
Because WarFrame is definitely something I’d like to be a part of? That is the sound of peace and hope right there :)
(Sorry. Not mocking you in particular, but Warframe? Not the most friendly sound names as names go, I think you’d have to agree).
Fable II was very weird for this type of thing.
A guy sat at the end of the bridge in Bowerstone South. And no matter what you gave him – money, rings, food, a diamond worth CR 6000 – he was still there the next day.
It was just weird.
The only benefit was it gave you KILLER purity scores – I mean you could go out and kill an entire village of innocent people and then just give him two diamonds and you would be rated as a saint again. If you liked that sort of thing :)
Okay – I wanna know what vaspider said about it.
I love the way everyone wants this to be a sitcom and I am just “Okay – that last line is hilarious” and that is all I can think about.
Would that be covered by Prime? Because it sounds like it would be expensive :)
Well first I’d worry that all these people look alike. I mean – are they quintuplets? And if so are we supposed to ship them with each other? Because that’s… creepy. (Not because they are all male – I write a lot of M/M stuff. I have no problem with that. But shipping brother with brother? That’s… just a little beyond my comfort zone)
Second – why are they all male? (Just curious).
Third – why is there a weird half person at the end? Was he cut in half during a tragic mining accident that left him forced to live the rest of his life as half a man? Or half a woman? And will this half woman or half man ever be fixed? Or are they happy? And – most importantly – am I putting way too much thought in to this?
Fourth – lets assume this is just some weird aberration where five (or five and a half) people all look alike but aren’t related, so you can ship them and get them to boff like bunnies.
Clearly you don’t get Google & Apple – you don’t get ANYONE and Apple (Apple is the Draco Malfoy of the technology world – evil, ambitious, cunning but ultimately alone and a little sad and will never understand why everyone pretends to like them but really despises them).
Sony & Disney – would make great films together.
Netflix & Disney – would conquer the streaming market together but should never be allowed to get together because they would team up and conquer the world.
(Okay. I’m done).
That wasn’t quite the point I was making :)
The person in the original post didn’t mention combustion engines.
Feels like it is a little about me.
One could say the same about the TV, about the internet, about block cypher encryption, about the economy, about the local sewage system, about the local water and electricity systems, about all sorts of things that we rely on every day.
Oh then there’s the boiler, the cooker, the microwave, the fridge, the telecommunications network…
At what point do I go “huh – maybe I should leave this up to people who went to school to learn about it” rather than trying to learn even the basics about everything that could go wrong in my life when there are CLEARLY people who know more about it than I do and are paid to know more about it than I do?
Hold on a moment – I don’t go around with a sandwich board on my chest or emailing every person I know.
I brought it up here because I thought it relevant to the topic. But if we were talking about hockey or baseball or what makes different clouds form at different levels then I wouldn’t have mentioned it.
And pride? Again I just mentioned it because it’s something relevant to the topic. I could easily have said I have no clue how nuclear reactors work or how to perform open heart surgery on a human being.
Would that have been boasting about my lack of knowledge? Or does not knowing about how to perform open heart surgery seem relatively normal?
I was just making a point that a lot of people don’t bother with some knowledge because it is shit they don’t need to know. And right now using AI tools is in that category for quite a large percentage of the population.
All due respect, you started this.
You attacked me for writing a post. Clearly you care enough to do that.
There’s a difference between passively using something and actively using something.
I use electricity every day, but I have no idea how it’s generated. I (assume I) use RSA256, but if you ask me to explain block cypher encryption to you I’d just go “well you take a number and another number and… hope they have sex to produce a bigger number?”
I use a lot of stuff without having to know how it works and having to choose to use it.
To be honest? Yeah.
In my last job before this one I learned a lot of stuff about a topic I needed to know for that job.
But now I have a new job I don’t need to know any of that stuff. So I am slowly forgetting it because I don’t use it. And instead I am learning a lot of stuff about things I need for my new job.
And in the midst of all of this why would I take the time to learn something I am never going to use. At all. Ever. I have far too much stuff to learn and remember, and why I would need to learn how to plug the camshaft into the reverse socket twink-phlange?
I am not afraid of technology. It doesn’t scare me. I am not sitting in a cave railing against these kids with their short skirts and their long hair and their music and “they didn’t do these things in my day”
I just made what I consider to be a fairly educated judgement call that this is something I don’t need to care about.
Yeah, that’s just judgemental and presumptive.
I have quite a lot of shit in my life, and I have actively decided to pay no attention to AI. Not because “I can’t keep up with it” but because after some research into it I decided “it was bullshit and nonsense and not something I need to know about”
There’s a difference between not knowing something because of ignorance and not knowing something because you know you don’t need to know it.
I have no idea how to rebuild a combustion engine.
Is that something of which I should be ashamed? Or something I have actively chosen not to learn because when will I ever need to know it?
If you think I am threatened by technology, you are barking up the wrong tree.
And if you think I don’t understand what AI is and what the flaws in it are, you are also barking up the wrong tree.
If you think I am some 60 year old man shouting at clouds who just wants to live in a cave with a firepit then you are barking at an entire forest.
This entire argument is predicated on the assumption that it is a benefit to my life.
What if I believe that it’s not? That it is an active detriment? That I can live my life better without it?
And this is not contempt prior to investigation. I’ve tried it, and I honestly believe that I can do things better without it.
You know people who connect their fridge to the internet, and their front door locks to the internet, and their central heating system to the internet?
What benefit does that give me? All it does is allow – or potentially allow – someone to hack into my fridge, my central heating and my front door.
Why would I do that? I mean – that would be ridiculous. I have a front door lock that’s an actual lock because it is almost certainly going to be more secure.
I can write my answers, my emails, my letters better than AI can. I can write proposals at work better than AI can.
I can manage my life better than AI can because based on everything I have seen there is nothing it can do that is anywhere near as competent as I am.
Yeah, that’s just bollocks. (No offence) (okay a little offence).
Harry had already saved the world when he was eighteen months old. He was already a super special boy given THE ENTIRE MAGICAL WORLD KNEW HIS NAME before he did.
So the idea that making him a seeker was a way to make him special?
That’s just crap.
I know people who use “air quotes” to put “emphasis” on words if they are “trying” to make a “point”
But I don’t know if that comes from people using quotes originally to do the same thing.