- 8 Posts
- 43 Comments
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml•"Limited nuclear war"0·1 month agoYou have to consider the population density in China. One nuke aimed at an ‘important target’ could pretty easily kill a few million Chinese as collateral.
This would obviously give China all rights to launch a counterattack.
Unfortunately one Chinese nuke cannot do the same to Americans because Americans just don’t live densely enough, which means for a sufficient response China probably needs to launch 5+ nukes per one American nuke.
Of course, the Americans will just launch four or five nukes in response, which will kill ~20-30 million more Chinese. At which point, everyone will be nuking each other.
TLDR There is no such thing as limited nuclear war because any limited strike on China will probably kill enough people to justify a massive counterattack, at which point full nuclear war will have begun.
I made a previous writeup on China’s current position in a nuclear exchange with the US:
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•lolbert surprisingly being a broken clock0·2 months agoLibetarians’ approach of complete isolationism for U.S. foreign policy is pretty good, actually. Critical support.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlOPto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•How should socialist-sympathetic businesses help revolution in the USA?0·2 months agoSure, but class consciousness depends mostly on material conditions. A comfy white-collar worker probably won’t be revolutionary until they and all their colleagues are almost homeless.
As much as it sounds nice for businesses in the U.S. to treat employees and clients nicely, in practice they just lose to ones that are more ruthless. A startup like Uber who seeks to grow as much as possible must ruin the jobs of as many taxi drivers possible, as quickly as possible, to become the dominant product. All the nice, moral, mom-and-pop taxi companies are all dead now.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•The Decline Will Continue Until Expropriation Begins.0·2 months agoAyy, fellow Inkscape user!
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•Why has Israel been invited to the 2025 Victory Day Parade?0·2 months agoI commented on this before: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7152559/6032209
Ya’ll please calm the heck down. There are long-running reasons for this invitation. One instance of realpolitik does not suddenly mean ‘Russia bad’, that is liberal thinking.
Before the collapse of the USSR, it had a sizable Jewish minority. The USSR saved many Jews from the Nazis, and most ended up living in the USSR.
After the collapse, that minority immigrated to Israel and make up about 15% of the Israeli population. Many have dual Russian-Israeli passports. 1 in 4 staff members in Israeli universities are native Russian speakers.[1]
These Russian Jews act both as a potent fifth column promoting Zionism in Russia, and facilitate useful political connections between Israel and Russia. For example, Israel has been rather quiet about Russia’s operations in Ukraine. In return, Russia doesn’t say much about Israel’s genocide in Palestine.
Because of these circumstances, Russia doesn’t readily oppose Israel. When Russia works with Iran, Russia explicitly says that they cannot involve themselves in an Israel-Iran conflict. The most Russia can do without pissing off their Jewish fifth column is to weaken American influence and hope that makes Israel less insane.
In 2024, Israel officially recognized Victory Day as a holiday, and is one of the only non post-Soviet countries to do so. It makes sense that Russia would return the gesture by inviting them to the Victory Day Parade in 2025. [2] Israel previously attended the 2018 parade at Russia’s invitation.
Russia has also invited China, India, Brazil, Slovakia, Serbia, and Mahmoud Abbas from the Palestinian Authority.
I don’t like this Russian invitation either, but it makes sense from Russia’s history with Jews. It certainly has better reasons than how much America buddies up with Israel. Russia actually protected Jews in WWII, while America just lies about their pro-Jewish history.
TLDR: Zionists fuck up the relations with Israel of any country they worm their way inside, and Russia is no exception.
Russia is also using Victory Day as a pre-summit before BRICS in July 2025. Russia has invited the BRIC members of BRICS alongside Eastern Europe and Israel. It would make sense for them to use the opportunity to talk.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What happens when everything gets automated under capitalism? Does it just become socialism by that point?0·2 months agoYanis Varoufakis just put a new label on monopoly capitalism. Marx wrote about it already. The end stage of capitalism is monopolies everywhere who charge monopoly rents, because rents are the easiest form of profit. No investment, just money.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What happens when everything gets automated under capitalism? Does it just become socialism by that point?0·2 months agoAy, I made a post asking this question before! https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6729708
TLDR: if the rich succeed in building AI systems that cater fully to their needs through the whole supply chain (i.e. AI can mine and process resources into what they want with no humans needed), then the rich will have no reason to keep anyone else around and can just massacre all the poors.
Recently, the r/singularity subreddit has had several posts which show some class-consciousness, despite they mostly-techbro atmosphere.
The post I’ve linked and reproduced below states a concern I also have with AI:
If we assume that we reach AGI, maybe even super intelligence, then we can expect a lot of human jobs will suddenly become obsolete.
First it could be white collar and tech jobs. Then when robotics catches up, manual labor will soon follow. Pretty soon every conceivable position a human once had can now be taken over by a machine.
Humans are officially obsolete.
What’s really chilling is that, while humans in general will no longer be a necessity to run a government or society, the very few billionaires at the top that helped bring this AI to existence will be the ones who control it - and no longer need anyone else. No military personnel, teachers, doctors, lawyers, bureaucrats, engineers, no one.
Why should countries exist filled with people when people are no longer needed to farm crops, serve in the military, build infrastructure, or anything else?
I would like to believe that if all of humanities needs can now always be fulfilled (but controlled by a very, very few), those few would see the benefit in making sure everyone lives a happy and fulfilling life.
The truth is though, the few at the top will likely leave everyone else to fend for themselves the second their walled garden is in place.
As the years pass, eventually AI becomes fully self-sustaining - from sourcing its own raw materials, to maintaining and improving its own systems - even the AI does not need a single human anymore (not that many are left at that point).
Granted, it could take a long while for this scenario to occur (if ever), but the way things are shaking out, it’s looking more and more unlikely that we’ll never get to a utopia where no one works unless they want to and everyone’s needs are met. It’s just not possible if the people in charge are greedy, backstabbing, corporate sociopaths that only play nice because they have to at the moment.
I find their argument quite valid, only lacking in the explicit mention of ‘capitalism’.
Once the rich have full-supply-chain-AI, we wouldn’t be able to revolt even if we wanted to. The robotic police force controlled by the rich can just massacre all the poors.
This puts a hard time limit on when revolution needs to occur. After that I guess we need China’s J-36s to save the American proletariat.
The F? He got ‘convicted’ for child enticement after he started agitating against the Iraq War. He was a US weapons inspector in Iraq, and was on the ground checking for WMDs pre-war and found none.
I’ll cite some previous comments I made, with sources:
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5319924/4836806
Just in case anyone brings up his weird history of child sexual offenses, he was never prosecuted for harming actual children. Both prosecuted offenses were supposedly sting operations (aka entrapment) by FBI and police, which makes them super suspicious. For example, the first one in 2001 was conveniently timed to interfere with his anti-Iraq War advocacy.
The US government seized his passport in early June just to stop him from attending the St. Petersburg Economic Forum and derail his planned tour of Russia, where he would’ve gotten more coverage of his antiwar advocacy.
I would not be surprised if the FBI makes up a new sex offense charge based on this raid to try to shut him up about Russia, since that got the media so riled up the last 2 times. Another kind of bogus charge also wouldn’t be a surprise.
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5319924/4838261
The 2001 sting operation was so conveniently timed that even Fox News had to point out how sus it looked: Former U.N. Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter: Timing of Arrest Reports Suspicious
Before he publicly came out against the Iraq war and denounced all claims of Iraq having WMDs, AIPAC even tried to buy Ritter off for 6 million dollars and a lifetime of luxury in exchange for him making up shit about how evil Iraq is. Ritter turns them down because he would not lie about Iraq’s WMDs.
Ritter talks about this on Danny Haiphong’s show here.
Ritter’s non-cooperation obviously has made him a massive target, especially because of his deep knowledge on the ground in Iraq and the military apparatus.
If Scott really just wanted to molest children for free, why didn’t he simply go to Israel and get his million-dollar book deal? After all, that’s what all the Zionist pedophiles in the U.S. do.
Scott Ritter isn’t a principled socialist due to his military background and career. Still, he is a valuable voice for anti-US-empire military analysis, since leftists with military training are few and far between. Politically, he falls in the same camp as military-analyst-turned libertarian anti-imperialists Ray Mcgovern, Larry Wilkerson, and Larry Johnson.
We do not and should not listen to libertarians’ proposals of domestic policy, but on fighting imperialist American foreign policy we are aligned.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml•I hate allos and their sexualization of any kind of relationships and everything in general (rant)0·3 months agoVampires are the ultimate bad-boy romantic aesthetic. How skilled at romance must a woman to wrap an immortal being around her finger? In that sense it’s kinda empowering.
Right now, werewolf romance novels are rather popular on reddit romance novel communities. This is the exact same kind of dude as a vampire except you also get animalistic boinking.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml•I hate allos and their sexualization of any kind of relationships and everything in general (rant)0·3 months agoPretty much, yes. Having read both, the horny energy is exactly the same.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml•I hate allos and their sexualization of any kind of relationships and everything in general (rant)0·3 months agoI think allos (myself included) ship other people so we can live vicariously through them. I don’t have time or energy for a romantic relationship RN, but watching others get together is kinda fun.
This practice is kinda harmless for fictional characters (and romantic subplots are usually the norm in said shows), but can definitely make IRL aces uncomfortable. Sorry about that, we should probably stick to fictional characters only.
I think vampires (specifically the hot mysterious dude kind of vampire) are popular mostly because they fulfill a certain niche of romantic fantasy. This niche used to be filled by the plethora of romance novels, which are mostly consumed by women. Today, romance novels have been supplanted by many more types of content, including stuff about vampires. Also, you can’t really blame normal, horny people for thinking about banging anything. R34 is a thing for a reason.
Scott Ritter’s house was raided by the Biden admin, so he is understandably pissed at them. Scott Ritter also knows people in the Trump administration personally, so he clearly hoped that he would have more influence over Trump and co’s actions. He has never ‘glazed’ Trump. He had hopes Trump would follow through on his peace plans.
Now that he sees that isn’t the case, Scott is also becoming quite vocal at criticizing Trump. He has repeatedly come out against the Houthi airstrikes.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoThe difference is that capitalists aren’t desperate. They commit crimes just to make numbers get bigger. Just fining corporations for doing crimes doesn’t do anything, because then it just becomes a cost of doing business. You must attack the people in the corporations making the decisions to make money, and the death penalty is one of the tools for that.
To understand the use of the death penalty, imagine how many worker hours a capitalist who steals a billion dollars takes away. Assuming the average US salary (~$66,000) and working lifespan (77.43 years - 20 yr childhood), they’ve stolen the entire life earnings of 264 Americans. These calcs look even worse for any non-U.S. country because the theft is usually done in the USD, but all the workers make a much less valuable currency.
As of now, China mostly uses death sentence with reprieve for financial crimes, which means that if the sentenced person doesn’t commit another crime in a couple years, their sentence gets demoted to life sentence. Actual execution has only been used for extreme cases, such as Sichuan mining tycoon Liu Han, worth $6.4 billion, for his crime syndicate of gambling, loan sharking, illicit arms trading, contract killing, and actual lethal shootings.[1]
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoWhen the heck did I say that LLMs are going to run society? AI is much more than just LLMs, though LLMs are the manifestation of the current stage of development of AI.
Companies like Walmart are already using automated systems to optimize product distribution and maximize profit.[1] There is no reason why we can’t use improved versions of these AI systems to centrally plan country-wide economics in the future to maximize well-being and other democratically-defined goals.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoPerhaps the punishment should be set after consultation with the victim. Sexual abuse absolutely must be punished and prevented though.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoDefinitely. I hope China will be the first country to find a good solution to the birth crisis faced by all developed countries, since no capitalist country has found a solution yet. Reducing working hours, providing social support, increasing household wealth and living standards, and decreasing stress from raising kids should hopefully fix this.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoBut better AI should be able to pick stickier shits, which will save work in the long run. I agree that AI should not be used to hurt workers, but will be very important for fully automated luxury communism.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoI agree on allowing culture to change naturally. When you try to abrupty impose social policies that oppose aspects of people’s culture, they naturally push back. I feel that much of the hostility towards LGBT and the like seems to be due to people’s desperation so they think that doing what “God” likes will get them more stuff. Naturally, if everyone has all the stuff they need, then no one will need to care much.
Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.mlto Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•What is your single most right-wing view?0·3 months agoDeath penalty is good actually, as long as it isn’t used just on minorities. Super useful to scare capitalists.
Thanks, fixed!