Lonoke County, enjoy your new sherrif Judge Dredd. What a horror show of a political system you have when an accused murderer can secure more than half the population’s approval for a law enforcement role and an accused serial rapist and conman can secure more than half the population’s approval for the presidency.
If he ever made a local appearance, as a fellow Dane I would ask why he was ruining the scenery by showing his face in such a beautiful part of the country. He’s not only a great example of why P2P is more than just people wanting free shit, he also made a pretty good case that money can’t buy happiness or talent
Lars Ulrich, the only Dane I never liked. Most Danes are agreeable but Lars had someone piss in his baby bottle and he never got over it.
Our friend below details this fairly well, but in a society where “my” taxes are a sign of ownership of debt, do you really think that’s healthy? How about the alternative where everyone has the same investment and therefore the same access to public goods and services? Feel free to double down, but I just don’t see the point of people arguing the necessity to own debts incurred on them from a structurally unsound social and economic system. It’s weird and has the aire of Stockholm Syndrome.
Thank you for giving a real world example of a rational human who can disagree with the premise while also understanding its intent and origin. All these other numpties downvoting me didn’t bother to do the 2 minutes of critical thinking, so good on you mate!
Grammatically you are spot on, numerically you are missing a bit of nuance. In a society where everyone paid the same equal and fair amount, the ills we see simply would not exist.
Mark my words. This is going to be put in an Adam Curtis documentary at some point!
No. The only thing distressed here is their warped ideology.
Because i’m not American.
98% of the world is reactionary? Uh ok.
How interesting this hasn’t gotten any traction! Guess that’s more proof she was correct.
When people come to me with missing pieces, I still consider them complete humans. Most people are puzzles, and so this question seems like it answered itself.
If you’re saying you’re flexible enough to squeeze into your seat while that 15° is fully used, happy for you. Not everyone is an acrobat nor interested in accommodating slouchers.
It’s always funny to me when people complain about others restricting their slouching on a flight. The way j get around this is to get up every 30-45 minutes and stretch, take a little jaunt around the aisles and if I’m not grossed out by the first peep at the lavatory, take care of business, since I’m sipping on water the entire flight to combat jet lag. I must be in a hidden third category that doesn’t care too much about reclining my seat. If others recline, that’s okay because they’ll quickly learn that every half hour or so, they’re gonna have to push that seat upwards so I can get in and out. And if they don’t, they can explain why to the attendant I’ll be grabbing shortly.
Imagine that: bike lanes!
This might be the most honest assessment of humanity and its unhealthy relationship to technology I’ve seen. Ever.
You’re forgiven for thinking English is my native language. :)
Haha. America is a such weird place. What is the benefit of having one of these things pick you up vs. inherit risks?
I rather enjoyed this lashing, and I appreciate the sane take amidst a sea of nonsensical panic and rumors.
I laughed during this entire tirade and gave you a thumbs up because of it. I’m a Dane and won’t return the insult of being labeled an American. But I don’t appreciate your tired arguments that privatization of public utilities is a necessary good, like what my own country did with its rail system. I don’t appreciate the reality of millions of hands that extend to reach safe borders to be told “no, we have too many workers already” when the issue isn’t “enough work” but private profit and governments colluding around the gold pile they’ve built. There is no societal burden except the ones we create for ourselves.