the internet is deluged by news stories so please be careful with what you read about this. reports from the victim (girl)'s mother indicate the alleged killer was 2 years older than, and not friends with, the victim. it sounds like rivalry to me.
I don’t think any of the folks who responded are; it’s mostly angry noise from people who need to share an opinion but haven’t researched any current events sufficiently to provide one. It’s what I call “dogpiling” where they jump into a discussion which starts with critique even if they don’t agree with (or understand) it because the act of sharing their opinion is more important than learning anything. Your comment is similar, but I’m sure you can see that now. :)
Anyway, I won’t waste any more time educating you folks. My point is the first sentence of my original comment. If reading comprehension is the issue here maybe you could reach out to your educational institution for a refund, assuming you paid for it.
You’ve neatly demonstrated exactly what I was talking about; dogpiling, lack of understanding about the issue, and a need to share an opinion without contributing anything to the discussion or your inadequate education. I’m sorry but I’m out of volunteer hours and you can’t afford my rate. Have a day. 🫱
the internet is deluged by news stories so please be careful with what you read about this. reports from the victim (girl)'s mother indicate the alleged killer was 2 years older than, and not friends with, the victim. it sounds like rivalry to me.
No shit? Like that wasn’t patently obvious?
What point are you trying to make? This girl is a psychopath.
Read my original comment - that’s the point I’m trying to make
Your original comment is unclear or unnecessary, I think that’s why people are confused.
Are you confused about the point I was making?
I don’t think any of the folks who responded are; it’s mostly angry noise from people who need to share an opinion but haven’t researched any current events sufficiently to provide one. It’s what I call “dogpiling” where they jump into a discussion which starts with critique even if they don’t agree with (or understand) it because the act of sharing their opinion is more important than learning anything. Your comment is similar, but I’m sure you can see that now. :)
Anyway, I won’t waste any more time educating you folks. My point is the first sentence of my original comment. If reading comprehension is the issue here maybe you could reach out to your educational institution for a refund, assuming you paid for it.
🫱
What is wrong with you?
Elaborate?
The headline already did.
Wait you were just asking about me, now you’re pivoting back to the headline? What can I help you with?
You’ve neatly demonstrated exactly what I was talking about; dogpiling, lack of understanding about the issue, and a need to share an opinion without contributing anything to the discussion or your inadequate education. I’m sorry but I’m out of volunteer hours and you can’t afford my rate. Have a day. 🫱
Sorry. Using words and sentences doesn’t help grow your knowledge maybe repeated “memes” will?
I can’t help but notice it says all that in the headline
🤚
Is there a point to your comment…? It’s only pretty rivalry, so let the sociopath walk? Is that what you’re saying?
which of your questions do you want me to answer
Let’s start with all.
no
How enlightening. Really stick to your guns, dontcha?
I don’t have time to respond to speculation and I don’t match energy with fools
sorry
happy new year
The pile of response you’ve left after saying this proves that was a lie.
pats head Sure. They outwit you constantly.
The classic “I’m too far above you to explain myself” defense after being backed into a corner by someone who is probably smarter than you
I said time was the limiting factor, silly gosling. Not “being above” someone. How on earth would you even measure that? lol
Lmfao