Reality check: Trump pledged to end the program in 2016.

Called it. When push comes to shove, Trump is always going to side with the ultra-rich.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Its actually very worrying.

      He’s already killed a budget bill and defied a MAGA bread and butter policy issue, for his obvious benefit, back-to-back with zero real pushback. His bounds seem basically unlimited.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        4 days ago

        Defied MAGA bread and butter

        Lol, he’s done with MAGA. He got his term, he has no further use for his supporters or their agenda. Discard them like toilet paper.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m predicting that Musk will be fired within a year of Trump’s reign.

        Didn’t r/legaladvice have an ongoing betting pool of who was going to get fired next?

        Maybe we need to start one here.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not obvious Trump can fire him. Musk didn’t only contribute to the Trump campaign, but also brought in tech billionaire friends. Earlier in the year, the GOP National Convention was running on pocket change. It’s quite possible Musk brought in the cash they desperately needed, and they expect a return on that investment.

          Trump might have needed a reminder about who is actually in charge.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            4 days ago

            Trump doesn’t care about the Republican party. Nor does he honour agreements. Hell use them while they benefit him, financially or otherwise. Then dump them when it suits him to. He expects loyalty, he doesn’t give it. The question is will this happen before or after musk gets what he wants. Or if musk just wants power and has not got a single objective.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              He can ignore the little people. He can’t ignore the people who saved his campaign. Even though this is his last term (probably), they can chew him up in other ways if he doesn’t fall in line.

              • jrs100000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                4 days ago

                Screwing over investors is his second favorite thing, right after screwing over contractors.

                • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Right but now he’s playing with the big boys. This isn’t like when “Trump <whatever>” fleeced some rubes, now Trump is in deep with the oligarchs of the modern gilded age.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s the thing isn’t it? You can’t actually buy political influence, the closest you can get is the wink and nudge.
            The only lever they have is threatening to not donate again.

            Trump doesn’t care if they donate to the GOP again. He’s not running again. Musk and friends have served their purpose, or very nearly so. The promise of their donations can be leveraged to get the votes needed to ensure appointments that can help keep trump in power or out of jail at the end of his term, be they administrative, judicial or military.

            Money can be useful to power, but it’s not itself power.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              "Hey, Clarence, how you doing? Virgina doing OK? Good, good. Hey, I was just thinking, my wife and I were going to use the yacht this weekend, but we had something else come up. It’s all stocked and fueled, and it’d be a shame if it went to waste. Would you and Virginia like to get away? Ok, excellent, I’ll let the crew know.

              “Oh, and Thomas, you know that big ruling on Trump’s boarder plan? Yeah, make sure it doesn’t go the President’s way. Yes, of course, I’ll make sure there’s plenty of eyebrow torture porn on the shipboard theater.”

              They have plenty of levers against Trump.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                In that example, he doesn’t actually care about a wall. How does a wall benefit him? He cares about diverting money to his pocket, maintaining power, and staying out of prison.

                The supreme court already gave him personal immunity for most acts he takes while president. He could literally order Thomas arrested for corruption and there’s nothing the court could do to him.

                Musk has utility while he potentially helps secure votes on appointments that matter for significant goals, but securing those appointments is also desirable for other Republicans, so musk isn’t key to those plans.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The supreme court already gave him personal immunity for most acts he takes while president.

                  Not how that ruling works. The Court gets to decide what is and isn’t an official act, and can do so arbitrarily. The Court just might take issue with murdering any members of the conservative wing.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            They can expect whatever they want but they have nothing to offer anymore. Trump will keep grifting the rubes and can’t run in any elections where funding would matter.

              • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                4 days ago

                What would stick on Teflon Don?

                The guy is literally a pedophile, serial rapist, felon, obvious idiot, demented and drug addled. He could be the lovechild of Hitler and Stalin, born in the Congo, openly sworn fealty to Xi, Putin and the Satan, it wouldn’t matter.

          • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            As far as the SCOTUS has said, he can do a lot more than firing, which is my biggest concern…

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Depends on how brazen Trump gets. If he executive orders Elon and the Executive Orders all of his money goes to him directly, yeah… Trump can fire Musk.

            Remember fascism is a concentric cone. If Trump decides he doesn’t want Musk, only his money, he will.

            • Tyfud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Right. This is a lesson the Russian Oligarchs keep learning the hard way. Anytime Putin wants their money, they fall out a window and their assets are forfeited to the state (Putin).

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Trump was always going to side with moneyed interests. Though he is certainly racist, he doesn’t care about his supporters or what they want. His in-group is crass wealth.

    • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump didn’t even hesitate to kiss the ring. Immigration is his number one issue. He killed the bipartisan bill to run on it. Elon snaps his fingers, and Trump publicly supports his pro-immigration position, which legitimately devalues American workers to create indentured servitude for highly-skilled workers from abroad. The H1B guys were the ones working at Twitter until 2am, while their boss was on drug binges, and sleeping in cots in their offices.

      I don’t think Trump even kissed Putin’s ass this much. I hate Trump, but I never thought of him as not having balls, especially against a fucking moron like Elon.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Followers aren’t abandoning Trump over one issue. TBH Elon will probably tamp this down by manipulating Twitter.

      But this is a preview of things to come, as Axios notes.

      • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        TBH Elon will probably tamp this down by manipulating Twitter.

        He already is. He’s demonetizing any right wing chuds that oppose him on this and they’re melting down over it. It’s hilarious.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also me, though. I was hoping H1B visa status would die a well deserved death. It’s basically indistinguishable from indentured servitude and causes massive issues in having a free and equitable labor market.

      I don’t personally agree with any limits on immigration but if we’re going to have limits then everyone we admit should be treated no different from a citizen in most ways - they shouldn’t be tied to specific employers or anything else that will cause domestic wage deflation.

      Fuck Trump with a rusty dildo - but I was hoping he, and not Elon, came out on top in this one.

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    350 million people in the US and none of them are talented enough for this guy. The government had 350 million chances to educate and professionalize, and here we are outsourcing to India because Musk isn’t happy with the current crop.

    Lmao

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      H1B workers kept Twitter from imploding. They couldn’t quit unless they had a new job lined up. They couldn’t complain about having to sleep in the office or they might get deported.

      Native US workers could just walk out.

      This is why Muskrat loves visa workers

    • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s because this crop doesn’t want to work for tree fiddy and on 4h of sleep every day. How is he gonna wipe his tears with money if he has to pay people?

    • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      And of course is has nothing to do with talent and training at all, the US (and many others) created the system where you put yourself into huge debts to get the education the companies need from you, and then they also don’t want to pay you a wage that will allow you to live comfortably and crawl out of that debt.

      So then they buy the government and arrange for people with similar education, who are more desperate, less informed of labour laws and unable to switch jobs when they get here.

    • heavy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Right?

      Let there be no mistake, it’s not about talent so much as it is about keeping wages low. Many tech companies do this explicitly, especially since interest rates rose and investing money stopped being free.

      Anecdotally, I was at a company and was instructed not to hire in the US. I could choose Montréal, a few countries in Europe, or Isreal.

      US was off limits, not enough budget.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Many of them have been doing this shit since the 90s. When I read about how “we no find coderz in the U.S!” I know it’s complete horse manure. I suppose there are some niche fields where it might actually be hard to source certain types of engineers or what have you.

        But seriously, programming? You cannot find that locally? GTFO with that…

        For a brief blip there I hoped that agent orange might actually blow up H-1B, even if for the wrong reasons, but this outcome (moneyed interests calling the tune) is entirely expected, I guess. Even if his racist base haaaaaates it.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hilarious, south african oligarch imports talent to exploit instead of hiring American and the people who voted for his puppet are shocked. Literally everyone tried to tell them it was a grift, so if we all gotta suffer I’m going to be laughing at them the whole way.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh, so technically this is a repost of https://lemmy.world/post/23634989

    The URL has already been posted, but Axios ninja edited the article as events unfolded, as they tend to do. I’m treating this as a new development, but mods, please delete if you think that’s prudent.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Now his minions will struggle to change their rhetoric to figure out how they agree with him.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because in Trump’s mind you can deport them after you burn through them. The shocking part would be if Trump wants to give them citizenship.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    All the Trump/Musk hate aside, this is the correct decision in this case. So good job, broken clock.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It absolutely isn’t. H1B visa holders are basically indentured servents. It’s an absolutely awful policy to tie immigration to a persons employment status with a specific employer (or another employer willing to accept the paperwork of maintaining H1B employees which you must find rapidly of you lose your job).

      We have skill based immigration and I’d much rather these H1B applicants got in under that and could choose to move jobs if their employer is abusive. As it is many H1B visa holders end up trapped in underpaid overworked positions for fear of needing to suddenly relocate their lives again.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agreed. If donvict ended H-1B, it would probably end up being the only good thing he ever did. Ideally, it’d be ended, then augmented with some system that expedites encouraging/getting people here and having permanent status, with no ties to any corporations.

        That second part I doubt donvict would do because he’s a racist, but if H-1B was ended, we’d see what kind of pressure builds up to balance things out by permanent immigration. If it becomes a real need where talent for things like programming hits some breaking point[1], companies can lobby to have immigration expedited w/o indentured servitude. Let’s see if they do that…

        [1] again, even typing this out…LOL. How many people are/were being cranked out of coding bootcamps? Did all those people disappear? Where are all the people getting laid off going? If the industry would stop discarding people past some stupid arbitrary cut-off on age - egregious, pervasive ageism is NORMALIZED within the software industry - if you want everyone to have 10 years experience with a certain constantly shifting set of tools/languages, but want them in their twenties, with no spouse and no kids and no other obligations, willing to work wayyyyy beyond 40 hours for no compensation, you’ve just done a self-own and have no one to blame but yourself. Going out to industry press/social media/government and declaring that you cannot find the talent locally is obviously concocted BS.

        I now know so many people that have been chewed up and spit out by the industry and mostly it’s because they were too unwise to do a very human thing and age beyond their mid-30s. It gets sharply worse in the 50s. Not because they don’t have the education and the experience. It’s because they have a life outside of work, have relevant experiences they can bring to bear (making younger management often look bad in that process) and are not quite so malleable as someone in their early 20s.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not that they’re correct - they just happened to be on the right side of this issue for terrible reasons.

          I want skilled immigrants to have more rights - they want them to not exist - both I and a lot of MAGA folks think H1B visas are bad but for extremely different reasons.