• YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, doesn’t somebody still need to validate that those keys only get to people over 18? Either you have a decentralized authority that’s more easily corrupted or subverted or else you have the same privacy concerns at certificate issuance rather than at time of site access.

    • jaschop@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      The point would be, to roll it all into the ID issuing process. I think most EU IDs already have cryptographic identities built in. The certificate issuing should probably be a state service as well. The alternative would probably be, just mail your birth certificate and a 3D scan of your anus to the private age verification provider of your choice.

      It of course all falls back to a central state authority. But the process wouldn’t have to be more centralized and privacy-invasive than state IDs already are. Control of resident data could be kept at municipality level, and you wouldn’t need a central approver, that gets a running feed of all my age-restricted activities.

      Before I sound like I’m soying over ID verification, I’ll add that all this junk can become insidious very quick, if it becomes easy to implement and gets used everywhere. I also detest beyond measure that my ID currently stores a scan of my fingerprint, and I hope the court-ordered deadline makes that shit illegal again in 2027.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Control of resident data could be kept at municipality level

        no, they’ll fuck it up as hard as possible. These are not people who give a shit about the privacy of the plebs.