• LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wifi 7 is insanely fast to point where it can easily be just as good as wired ethernet and can even beat a lot of the wired standards except the few latest ones. It’s a good choice for devices where running a cable wouldn’t be very practical, but you need wired level speed and reliability.

    • jim3692@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember watching a video from Linus demonstrating a WiFi router. I don’t remember if it was WiFi 6 or 7, but any obstacle could cause connection drops.

      I don’t know if things have improved since then, but I usually bond WiFi and PowerLine for rooms that Ethernet cannot reach.

    • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      wired level speed and reliability.

      While WiFi is a lot better nowadays I’ve never seen it reach the reliability of wired networks.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nah, wifi is pretty good today. I just dont like the consumer devices like the router shown here. Recently redid my wireless and went with a non wifi router, a poe switch and a few access points, connected through ethernet. I wouldnt dream of going back to the conventional one wifi router. Still use wired for stationary devices I can reach with a cable though… TV, AV, consoles, PC are all wired.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      To be honest, I think a lot of Lemmy users are old and yearn for the older technologies simply because they have been more familiar with them than newer ones. They would have used the first gen of a technology, which may not be efficient, and dismiss it altogether, without realising that subsequent generations of that technology improves over time.

      I have had that realisation of cognitive bias when I had Bluetooth headphones back in early 2010s. The wireless connection isn’t great and gets cut off every now and then. I dismissed the technology as less efficient than wired earphones. It was over the years with the popularity of airpods that I gave wireless earphones another chance. And honestly, the Bluetooth connectivity vastly improved than I expected and I would not go back to using wired earphones again on regular basis because I don’t have to deal with the wires getting tangled or yanked. I only use wired ones as backup if my wireless earphones went missing or broke.

      Sorry to say this to OP, but it seems that you’re being an old man yelling at the clouds. Look, I’m also old and I admit I have had that moment of yelling at the clouds too. We will have that more moments as we age.

      • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have a similar setup to @[email protected] in regards to my home network and I wouldn’t dream of removing my wifi network. I still consider wired to be superior though it rarely matters at those latencies.

        My Windows laptop on wifi:

        My Fedora on wired network:

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Given the choice, I’d definitely choose a cable for anything I know will require high internet usage. Wireless is just too slow, even on a 5G connection.

    I still remember I once broke my Windows installation (young me had tried dual-booting the Windows 10 beta and my Windows 7 installation). I had to get system restored discs from the manufacturer. It wasn’t particularly tricky to fix, but it took a long time to download those Windows updates after it finished. I noticed an immediate change once I remembered I had an old 30 ft. ethernet cable lying around and plugged it in. (This was maybe 8-10 years ago.)

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wireless tech has improved greatly over the last 20 years. Speed, latency, bandwidth, stability…all generally excellent. 15 years ago I wouldn’t have wanted to use a wireless mouse or LAN connection. Now? NBD. They just work. Still have issues with poor signal in some areas, but mesh range boosters take care of that pretty easily.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          50mbps is a fuckterrible bitrate for 4k HDR video content.

          You should be playing physical media anyway, though.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Wtf dude, that was the example you provided, and then you mocked it. Make up your mind.
            If it was a shitty example, why did you use it?

            What would be a good example of things people commonly want and have access to but that wireless cant do?

            • nef@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              They’re saying 50Mbps 4k is shitty, not that 4k is a bad example. Modern Wi-Fi can definitely handle high-bitrate video 99% of the time, but that 1% where someone turns on a microwave can cause hella buffering. If you have the ability to run ethernet there’s no benefit to using Wi-Fi.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Seriously, I was going to add my WiFi6e is theoretically way overkill for my limited usage and that’s supported by speed tests, yet I do notice its limitations while gaming. It’s got the bandwidth, it’s even got the low latency, but it also has the glitches. Until that speed is reliable enough to never impact my games, it’s not worth being my first choice

                Even then, wired is better where appropriate because it just works. The more devices I can put on Ethernet, the fewer require the extra setup of wifi, the extra risks to eavesdropping and single points of failure, and yes the fewer where I ever have the frustration of glitches

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Why are you limited to 50Mbps 4k, if not limited by the server? I haven’t had an issue with microwaves in like a decade. Maybe it’s an issue for people with bachelor apartments where their router and microwave are on the same table?

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                What do you consider a reliable connection?

                I just tested my connection to my ISP on my wireless gaming computer, and I got:
                2ms ping
                0ms jitter
                0% packet loss\

                500mbps down
                And almost those same numbers from my phone in the next room.

                So what do you consider the qualifications for “reliable” connect, if that doesn’t meet them?

  • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I set up a mesh router pair a while back - super easy setup, and the speed is good enough to have multiple TVs streaming at once, and without needing to run cables between rooms… Worth it.

    • AngryMob@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem with wireless isn’t speed anymore, its stability. For a lot of applications that’s fine since buffering and whatnot hides any hiccups. but gaming for example is a nightmare on wireless still.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve been playing FPS exclusively on wireless for almost 15 years (802.11n 5ghz) and stability has been fine unless you set up your access point far away from your gaming PC for some reason.

        Back then you had to get a pretty nice wireless router to do it, but it still worked fine.
        Now days even relatively cheap routers will let you game just fine unless you set up far away from the AP and you’re in a pro tournament.

        • AngryMob@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you arent sensitive to jitter, packet loss, etc., and the various ways games react to it, then im happy for you.

          Personally, i and many others hate it. It only takes 1 rubber band moment in a shooter to ruin a round, it only takes 1 round to lose a match. Even if you aren’t playing super sweaty, its not fun. Even my wife who only games casually noticed the difference between wireless vs wired in a few different shooters after i ran a wire to her new desk. And we do have a good setup overall.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Dude, what you’re describing is not a “good setup overall”.

            I know I’m not sweaty, but what you’re talking about goes beyond being “sensitive” or not. Wtf is wrong with your wifi that you’re getting any packet loss.

            I just ran a speed test multiple times from my phone in another room, and got jitter under 20ms, and packet loss between 0% and 0.1%
            My gaming PC with external antenna in the same room as my wireless AP is going to get even better results.

            So I’m curious what kind of numbers you’re expecting to be noticable to a casual or even sweaty non-pro player?

            • AngryMob@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Testing on my phone with a few different services: 0.0 to 0.2% packet loss. 9 to 12 ms jitter. Ping 5 to 25. (Edit: also this is same room but with 4k tv wireless streaming going on)

              I’m not claiming to be a network expert on why wireless is noticably worse in practice, i picked out packet loss, jitter, etc randomly, i assumed that’s how it manifests. but i’d suspect these tests aren’t indicative of actual game netcode. They are short too. The whole point is the stability. If i play for 15 minutes no issue but suddenly have a single rubberband, thats an issue which may not show up in 100 tests.

              On wireless i can feel that pretty much every session. Everything fine for a while, then not for a moment, then fine, etc.

              On wired i only have an issue if the server itself or my isp itself is having an issue.

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Are you connected over 5ghz or 2.4?
                2.4ghz overlaps with other consumer devices that cause interference, like microwaves, drones, and cordless (landline) phones. If one of those devices turns on nearby, it could cause that until your router hops bands.

                I haven’t had this problem with 5ghz (so for over a decade, on my gaming PC).

                • AngryMob@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Yeah ive had 5ghz for ages as well. Use a channel scan to try and avoid my couple neighbors, Pretty decent hardware (not isp junk). House is small so max distance is only 1 wall and ~15ft.

                  Honestly id just guess you arent as sensitive to it. Are you the type who doesn’t notice other types of screen related feeling stuff too? Like 60fps vs 120+, input lag, or screen tearing, micro stutter, macro blocking, soap opera effect, etc.?

                  I’ve known plenty of people who are more or less sensitive to all the various ways things fuck up.

                  If you are sensitive to the other things, then who the hell knows lol.

  • cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I spend a lot more money on good Ethernet switches. But at least that works and is easier to manage than Wifi.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        $6.99/5’ of cable. A weekend of manual labor running cable through my walls.

        Or $300 for something I can set-and-forget.

        Decisions, decisions.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          $300 in labor is wildly optimistic and true for a simple cable run, maybe

          If run probably even a “short” run will typically be at least 20ft. Think, from a wall plate, up an 8ft wall, across a crawl space, down another 8ft wall.

          Not all cable runs are simple

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        My house is relatively new (built 2005), and they pulled cat5 for all the telephone lines and just didn’t hook up the extra pairs of wires. Since nobody uses landlines anymore, I rewired most of the outlets for RJ45.

        Have pulled a few more wires, including fiber to my main office PC (so I can have a very fast connection to my NAS). Once you learn a few techniques and the way your building is laid out, it’s not that hard.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah, you got to skip over the “getting the wire there” part. If you wanted to replace all that line with cat 5e or cat6 so you can get full duplex gigabit speeds it’d be a much harder task than slapping some rj-45 end onto some old cat 5.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    But what if you’re gaming downstairs and the router is upstairs and then you have to go upstairs for pizza rolls so you take your gaming laptop upstairs and you’re eating right next to the router and so you’re just plugged in and then what if you forgot to turn off the oven and your girlfriend is yelling at you “You’re going to start a fire! Why can’t you remember to turn off the oven? What’s wrong with you?” and then you go back downstairs to finish gaming?

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If that happens often enough to be worth 43 times more than the cat cable, then it sounds totally justified to me. But also, what if you got a toaster oven for upstairs? To put next to the router?

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I got a used 10Gbe switch and a thunderbolt 10Gbe adapter for my computer and now I can transfer my videos and photos from my NAS like it’s my internal hard drives.

    It can also do 2.5Gbe which pretty much future proofs me.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wireless data links should be the exclusive domain of temporary, nomadic and/or sacrificial applications.

    If the channel is permanent, static, or critical; as much of the path as practicable should be provisioned with constrained energy transmission.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Would be cool if building code standards included Cat5 (or even better, USB) along with the standard power and phone connections of new builds.