• lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    you realize that not everyone is as healthy/strong as the average man. do you really want an elderly person or a chronically ill person subjected to a head on collision ?

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      If they don’t want to smash into things, they can drive to the conditions. Their cars have lights, it’s just a matter of using them properly by driving at an appropriate speed.

      • lseif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        the ‘conditions’ dont include a maniac camouflaging dangerous objects to purposely make innocent people crash.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          If they didn’t smash into the bin, then sooner or later they’d risk smashing people instead. Drag would rather bins be run over than people. They won’t be innocent when their reckless driving gets someone killed.

          • lseif@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Actually, I agree! We should also shoot dead drug users and lowlifes… otherwise they’re going to hurt someone eventually!

            See more...

            /s

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Letting reckless drivers run over a bin won’t cause any deaths unless they’re going fast enough to turn a pedestrian into red paint. For all real world cases, it’ll simply be a bit of self-inflicted property damage.

              • lseif@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                okay. i suppose a more similar comparison would be the police distributing laced weed (or other drugs, if weed is legal where u live). it only hurts the druggies who are reckless enough to take drugs, right ?

                you are also forgetting the fact that a painted bin will still be an inconvenience for the well-intentioned driver. you arent making it better for them. you are only making it detrimental to those who dont react in time.

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  It’ll be better for responsible drivers. They can just drive around it easily once they see it, and they won’t have to share the road with reckless drivers, because the reckless drivers will have cars with smashed fronts. That’s a few seconds in exchange for possibly saving their lives.

                  And it’s not the same as laced weed, because smoking weed doesn’t hurt anyone, and laced weed does. Reckless driving kills people, and black brick bins don’t. It’s the opposite way around.

                  • lseif@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    but weed can hurt you. it wont always. maybe it is unlikely even. but it can. same with reckless driving. if it were 100% chance u would die, people wouldnt do it.