Hrm, this seems logically flawed — it appears to be an association fallacy: Let A be a set containing “Elites”, “Oligarchs”, and “Plutocrats”. Let B be a set of things that are considered “bad”. Let C be a set of things that are considered capitalist. If A is a subset of B, and A is a subset of C (assuming that that is a correct subsumption), that doesn’t imply that C is necessarily a subset of B.
Of course, to avoid forming an argument from fallacy, I would like to clarify that this isn’t to argue that the final implied claim of “capitalism is the problem” is wrong, but simply that the argument used is unsound.
Hrm, this seems logically flawed — it appears to be an association fallacy: Let A be a set containing “Elites”, “Oligarchs”, and “Plutocrats”. Let B be a set of things that are considered “bad”. Let C be a set of things that are considered capitalist. If A is a subset of B, and A is a subset of C (assuming that that is a correct subsumption), that doesn’t imply that C is necessarily a subset of B.
Of course, to avoid forming an argument from fallacy, I would like to clarify that this isn’t to argue that the final implied claim of “capitalism is the problem” is wrong, but simply that the argument used is unsound.
Or it’s just purposely oversimplified to be funny.