• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Varied by country, the Jewish Oblast was kinda shit, but the land in Alaska had potential for example. The Alaska thing wasnt official just an idea a lot of folks were lightly okay with.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        There was also ones proposed in Uganda, southern Argentina, Madagascar, and Tasmania. Though I will note that last one is a bit scarce and I only know of it due to an obscure book from the 1890s.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          The Madagascar plan was the Nazis and explicitly designed to starve them all to death. I assume the Tasmanian idea is similar in goal. “Hey, this area will technically fit them all, we don’t need to check how much of the land is arable ;)”

          I don’t think you could create a sovereign space for a couple million refugees in either Uganda Argentina but feel free to correct me.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I think the Tasmania thing was a throw shit at the wall thing. But you could definitely keep a strong population in southern Argentina, that part of Patagonia is pretty fertile.