Once you’ve trained your large language model on the entire written output of humanity, where do you go? Here’s Ilya Sutskever, ex-OpenAI, admitting to Reuters that they’ve plateaued: [Reuters] The…

I’m usually the one saying “AI is already as good as it’s gonna get, for a long while.”

This article, in contrast, is quotes from folks making the next AI generation - saying the same.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.caEnglish
    11·
    7 hours ago

    I know the difference. Neither OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic have admitted they can’t scale up their chat bots. That statement is not true.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      3 hours ago

      So is your autism diagnosed or undiagnosed?

      I ask this as an autistic person, because the only charitable way to read what’s happening here is that you’re clearly struggling with statements that aren’t intended to be read completely literally.

      The only other way to read it is that you’re arguing in bad faith, but I’ll assume thats not the case.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        2·
        2 hours ago

        Also an autistic person here.

        How are people supposed to tell this is an opinion?

        And please dont say “by reading the article, maybe some (like me) do so but its well known that most people stop at the title.

        Grammatically speaking it remains a direct statement. They admit == appear to hint == pure opinion (Title: “Ai cant be scaled further”)

        While i am not disagreeing with the premise perse i have to perceive this as anti-ai propaganda at best, a attempt at misinformation at worst.

        On a different note, do you believe things can only be an issue if neurotypical struggle with it? There is no good argument to not communicate more clearly in the context of sharing opinions with the world.