Wow, interesting question. Yes, I do. Justice in human society is based on fairness and morality. I believe outside of human society the concept also exists, though different motives and all; and it definitely doesn’t take the exact same form as human justice. For example I think outside of human society the main motive is the survival of the species - very primal, very basic. Though these behaviors vary from species to species.
Would you agree justice has a core in safeguarding the innocents from harms coming from unethical actions outside of their control?
If so, how does that possibly survives in the animal kingdom?
How is “survival of the fittest” justice and not the description of a status quo that would benefit from some changes, possibly in the form of a tribunal?
Since you are both into law, do you believe justice exist outside of human society?
Wow, interesting question. Yes, I do. Justice in human society is based on fairness and morality. I believe outside of human society the concept also exists, though different motives and all; and it definitely doesn’t take the exact same form as human justice. For example I think outside of human society the main motive is the survival of the species - very primal, very basic. Though these behaviors vary from species to species.
Would you agree justice has a core in safeguarding the innocents from harms coming from unethical actions outside of their control? If so, how does that possibly survives in the animal kingdom?
How is “survival of the fittest” justice and not the description of a status quo that would benefit from some changes, possibly in the form of a tribunal?
Deep in the thread, asking deep questions.
If you ask me, survival of the fittest is not justice. It is what emerges from a zero-sum game and is not the optimal strategy for the human race.