• jwt@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    They’re not accessible anymore from a jurisdiction if said jurisdiction which rules they are violating decides to change their networking policies. And because twitter likes to be accessible, twitter decided to comply with the rules eventually. You seem intentionally obtuse btw.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Some thoughts: (1) networks don’t necessarily run according to judicial borders.
      (2) you also have to penalize the use of rerouting tools, which Brazil seems to have done.
      (3) it became incorrect to refer to it as “world wide web”

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        (1) Agreed of course, but I don’t see much of an issue there. You try to get a 100% coverage on your blockade, but 99% will move twitter to compliance too. same goes for (2). As for (3), I’m not really sure why you directed that at me.