yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

  • ccoonh@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    I used to use Arch btw.

    Now I am on Nix, I just love shell.nix files. I haven’t spent much time on my configs yet, but once I finish them, they’ll be super easy to set up again, thats cool.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Mint on my ancient MacBook because I didn’t really know any better and it’s working just nice for me, and Asahi/Fedora on my M1 mini, because it’s the only option.

  • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use LMDE. I use it because Mint has proved that it is worth using (for example: it provide easy way to install multimedia codec by only click “Install Multimedia Codec” in applications menu) and I want it to success.

    Sorry if my english is bad

  • timroerstroem@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Kubuntu on my desktop, I prefer KDE as a DE and I’m used to the Debian ecosystem.

    Linux Mint on my relatively low powered laptop that I rarely use.

    Debian stable on my media server.

  • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    MX Linux. It is Debian with setup and tools I really want but would be too lazy to prepare in one go. Love it as much as I love Debian.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Bazzite for my gaming pc, steam deck, and family members. It just works and they cant fuck it up. Even brother laser printers official drivers installed for my mom’s comp. Gotta check the details of that cups exploit though. My gamig pc is also the fallback pc I expect to always have working and for servicing any others if problems come up.

    Arch or arch based, except manjaro which has screwed me over too many times, for having easy access to pretty much any software that can run on linux, or just stuff that requires too many hoops to jump through to get working on atomic distros like bazzite.

    Dietpi on my SBCs like the ones running klipper for my 3d printers

    Debian for my servers, homeassistant etc, but I’m planning on checking out coreos.

    Also alpine just because.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Debian. Because it’s the best about “Just Works” (yes, even moreso than Ubuntu, which I tried). It has broken once on me, and that was fixed by rolling back the kernel, then patched within the week.

    BUT I’m also not a “numbers go up” geek. I don’t give a shit about maxing out the benchmarks, and eking every last drop of performance out of the hardware; to me, that’s just a marketing gimmick so people associate dopamine with marginally improved spec numbers (that say nothing about longevity nor reliability).

    If you wanna waste something watching numbers go up, waste time playing cookie clicker, not money creating more e-waste so your Nvidia 4090 can burn through half a kilowatt of power to watch youtube in 8k.

    (/soapbox)

    My gpu is an nvidia 970 and my cpu is a 4th or 5th generation core i7. I just don’t play the latest games anyway, I’m a PatientGamer, and I don’t do multimedia stuff beyond simple meme edits in GIMP.

    It has plenty of power to run VMs, which I do use for my job and hobby, and I do coding as another hobby in NVIM (so I don’t have to deal with the performance penalty of MS Code or other big GUI IDEs).

    It all works fine, but one day I’ll upgrade (still a generation or two behind to get the best deals on used parts) and still not waste a ton of money on AAA games nor bleeding-edge DAWs

    • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Fedora Core (the first one) was my first love in Linux. I tried SuSE before that but wasn’t as polished as it is now. That was more than 20 years ago!

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Fedora KDE.

    I was happily using Windows 10 until a few months ago, but needed to build a new PC. I got a glimpse of Windows 11 on a friend’s laptop and didn’t like it. So I asked my Linux-friend which distribution he would recommend to someone who wants to try Linux, but doesn’t want to stray too far away from the windows look and feel.

  • penguin202124@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Alpine Linux. It’s pretty lightweight (uses ~250MiB on idle with sway), is easy to install and is super stable. My only criticism is that there is quite a lot of software not available in the repos, but this is mainly fixed by flatpaks.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A few for different use cases. NixOS on my wife’s 14 year old laptop because it proved to handle the hardware the best, and she struggles with change so if that system dies the NixOS configuration can be redeployed identical to how she had it with no additional effort.

    Debian on my old IOmega NAS.

    OpenSUSE on my personal PC and Work computer, since it supports my proprietary CAD software, and nVidia releases a driver specifically for SUSE/OpenSUSE use.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Fedora.

    I’ve tried them all but found it’s the most reliable. It’s upgrades are even more reliable than Macos and Windows.

    Packages are very up to date but also well tested. Sometimes even newer than Arch for short periods.

    The community is awesome.

    I love Gnome, I’ve found it’s more consistent than even MacOs in its design. And it has perfect keyboard shortcuts.