• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the connection between the two might be more subtle than you think. bird flu has already jumped to cows and non infectious virus particles were identified in supermarket pasteurised milk. RFK endorses raw milk and is anti vaxx. Go figure.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My favorite dichotomy is found on things like hurricane Helene posts. The same people who say humans aren’t affecting the climate say the gov is manipulating the weather.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Also, some lab monkeys escaped in Florida recently. So, it looks like we’ll be starting another trump presidency with another pandemic. It’ll probably wait until he eliminates the pandemic response team again before it hits.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Am I the only one who found a message of “hope” in Idiocracy? We start at a future dystopia approaching human extinction caused by following some of the worst trends in current society. Then a savior appears, and they’re smart enough to actually follow him? They’re able to overcome some of their worst natures and start on the road to recovery.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I keep trying to tell people. We do not live in Idiocracy, Idiocracy is a fucking utopia compared to what our situation is

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Nah the stupidest timeline is simulation 28 where Elon Musk was able to capture the FDA and 30% of the US population was left mentally disabled by malfunctioning brain implants. Compared to those guys you’re doing just fine simulation 19.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Here we are, “Idiocracy .001”, folks. We are at the point where they haven’t even realized that they need a person with an actual brain. It will get worse, much worse. Maybe they will pick a pedophile for attorney general. Oh, wait.

  • s08nlql9@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    stupidiest timeline

    i’m waiting for MTG’s nomination and we should be good to go

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      She probably won’t get one since she called out Laura Loomer for saying the quiet part out loud being too racist

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Wow, I wasn’t even paying attention to her. Looks like she and Lauren Bobblehead both kept their seats. I really think this election confirms that we’re in a simulation, and a drunk grad student just fucked with it.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Statistically for some of us it’s always been Idiocracy…

    It’s only takes two standard deviations above 100, before the difference between you and the average person, is the same as average person and someone with an intellectual disability.

    If you’re really unlucky you’re 3 standard deviations above and then like 80%+ of the population would be classified as having an intellectual disability if your IQ was the frame of reference instead of 100.

    And our own IQ is literally our own frame of reference…

    So yeah. At any given point in human history, roughly 2%, definitely 0.1% have been living in fucking Idiocracy, and nothing will ever make it better for them.

    Ignorance is bliss, because you never deal with someone that far below yourself, and you don’t notice the other person being that much higher.

    But 30 points is the line, because that’s where differences become apparent and one sided frustration common.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You think bell graph distribution should be linear?

        I’m genuinely curious what you’re trying to say here

        • weker01@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          No I don’t think that of course.

          What I am saying is that the meaning of relative differences is non linear. That is 30 IQ points difference is not the same kind of difference from 70 to 100 points as from 100 to 130 nor from 150 to 180.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Nope.

            30 points is 30 points, and that’s the round number around the point where the difference is very apparent to the person 30+ above the other…

            If you’ve never experienced that before, most people never will. If you’re the one talking to someone that much higher than you, if you did notice you would just noticed you’re not understanding and you’d likely blame the person talking.

            Exactly like Idiocracy.

            Ignorance is bliss, because you never deal with someone that far below yourself, and you don’t notice the other person being that much higher.

            If you’re 100, only 2% are 30+ below you, and depending on your country you’ll never really run into them.

            But if you’re 145, it’s around 84% of the population, and the vast amount of people you interact with in public will give you that feeling.

            I understand you’re not getting this, but it doesn’t mean it’s something I just pulled out of my ass. You’re just not understanding it

            • weker01@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              I am getting what you are saying. It’s not difficult to understand but I understand that for you it must seem like I don’t get it.

              What I am stating though is that while you assume the relationship of IQ and that feeling you are describing to be linear it is in fact not.

              Like most relationships between metric and human feelings it’s highly non linear and individual to everyone. I disagree that someone with k+30 IQ feels the same about someone with k IQ no matter the reference IQ k.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I am getting what you are saying

                And then you go on to say you don’t get it…

                I disagree that someone with k+30 IQ feels the same about someone with k IQ no matter the reference IQ k.

                Have a nice life bub, it’ll be less frustrating than it is for some of us at least.