Tim's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Espiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 8 months ago

US Unveils Plan to Triple Nuclear Power By 2050 as Demand Soars

www.bloomberg.com

external-link
message-square
8
fedilink
1
external-link

US Unveils Plan to Triple Nuclear Power By 2050 as Demand Soars

www.bloomberg.com

Espiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 8 months ago
message-square
8
fedilink
US Unveils Plan to Triple Nuclear Power by 2050 as Demand Soars
www.bloomberg.com
external-link
President Joe Biden’s administration is setting out plans for the US to triple nuclear power capacity by 2050, with demand climbing for the technology as a round-the-clock source of carbon-free power.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • eleitl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe not https://ourfiniteworld.com/2024/11/11/nuclear-electricity-generation-has-hidden-problems-dont-expect-advanced-modular-units-to-solve-them/

    • moonlight@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know the particular details of this plan, but the article you shared seems to focus on problems
      with uranium. I don’t see thorium as having any of these problems. I’m not a nuclear scientist, but thorium seems like a no-brainer. One of the main reasons we use uranium in the first place is just because that fuel cycle is more convenient if we’re also making nukes.

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You can make nukes with material (U-233) bred in the thorium fuelcycle.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-233

        There are serious diverse problems with the thorium fuelcycle, including MSR. This is the reason it is not being developed vigorously. But China and India particularly are looking into it.

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    🤦‍♂️

  • TammyTobacco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s assuming we make it that long.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Energy production is not the bottleneck. The real problem is transport. Our infrastructure cannot handle the demand. We desperately need to upgrade the grid.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      and decentralize production and storage

  • Lugh@futurology.todayM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This will be a great way to channel vast sums of money from the American taxpayer to rich elites, for which the taxpayer will see little or nothing in return. Something the US public are about to see a lot more of.

Futurology@futurology.today

futurology@futurology.today

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4 users / day
  • 88 users / week
  • 199 users / month
  • 1.11K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 2.92K subscribers
  • 1.28K Posts
  • 6.43K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • voidx@futurology.today
  • Lugh@futurology.today
  • Espiritdescali@futurology.today
  • AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org