I just saw a post complaining about the Mozilla layoffs.

I wanted to point out that the vast majority of their income (over 85% in 2022) is from having Google as the default search engine - Ironically, the anti monopoly lawsuit against Google will end this.

Expect things to get worse.

Please don’t assume it was just a cruel choice.

S1 S2

  • flux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Where should they be “taking” funding instead?

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s the Mozilla paradox right there. A company like theirs cannot survive on the market without breaking their own ideals.

      • jcg@halubilo.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Serious question, is there actually a FOSS project out there at the scale of something like Firefox that survives on only donations?

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No because people choose diss cause it’s free. I mean they might say other things but then the vast majority do not donate to anything. People are cheap and that’s why we are where we are with all the ads.

            • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Corporate support of development, and I’m not just talking about Redhat and SUSE. Hell, Microsoft is a major contributor to the kernel.

    • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t know. Crowdfunding? How does Thunderbird keep it self afloat? Maybe better integration of the community as in more say in what will be developed depending on how much money you donate etc.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s exactly the worst way to prioritize. Money should not be influence. That always works out worse in every example in the history of everything.

          • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So it’s the default. Big deal. You can change that when you start the app first time. If that gets them funding that’s not a horrible price to pay. Also, that’s not money getting influence exactly, that’s a transaction. “We will pay $x to get this status.” Not the same at all as “I donated lots of money therefore I get to say how you develop the software.”

            • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I haven’t seen the contract between google and firefox.

              Maybe “how you develop the software” is a bit far-fetched, I was more thinking about decide where to put efforts into e.g.: continue developing Firefox’s core mechanic of being a privacy oriented webbrowser instead of… whatever they are doing with the funding they get.