I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I mean, considering how many incels voted for trump, I think we’re pretty much already there. Many of the young men who voted red this election already have no close relationships with any women their age. Obviously women should exercise their autonomy as they see fit. I don’t expect it to change how anyone votes.

    I’ll probably be downvoted for this, but progressives have spent the last several years actively shutting down lines of communication with men, particularly white men. For the best of reasons, sure, but it hasn’t been an effective strategy for winning elections.

    Maybe this would sway some group of center-left men who didn’t bother voting, but realistically I expect it will have no effect on the ongoing polarization, or exagerrate it.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?

    Or what is the point?

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Everyone in here arguing against 4b need to take a look in the mirror. The fact that so many of you are trying push against it is in itself a demonstration of why it’s necessary. Respecting bodily autonomy does not have to be hard.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Bodily autonomy is the ability to choose 4b, not the reason to do so. Folks arguing against 4b have not disrespected the ability to do 4b. Therefore bodily autonomy is still respected.

        • Ponchy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          “It’s over internet commenter! I have portrayed you negatively in a meme, showing you as the naive you are”

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes, posting a message on the internet while violating nobody’s personal space or rights is exactly the same as that picture. You did it! You won the internet! You can go away now.

          Go away

          Now

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Cute, the assumption that meme makes is that it’s clear the gal doesn’t want to participate in the conversation due to body language.

          There’s none of that when you’re commenting in a public politics community. You’re not posting in a community for 4b, for example. Additionally, you’re the one that made the initial comment.

  • Alienmonkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The no marriage part is interesting, the rest carries more unintended collateral.

    As a movement, removing the institutional component would affect the wider group, and their wallets.

  • InevitableList@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s interesting that the response to men going their own way (MGTOW) is indifference or at most pity whilst WGTOW are met with hostility.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Mgtow was not met with indifference. They’ve been consistently criticized since the movement first started, and they quickly evolved into a cabal of Nazi-adjacent freaks. Fuck those guys.

      There may be some good that could come from a men’s movement for self actualization and improvement, but mgtow sure as shit wasn’t that

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      MGTOW should be indifferent, but they kinda got hijacked into another red pill BS place. Their lives revolve around hate for women and not actually going your own way and finding what makes you content.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      By percentage, but the total birthrate would (continue to) go down.

      And now Trump’s gonna make it harder to immigrate, so the population may actually start nosediving.

    • femtech@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not more kids by total but more kids by %. But it won’t be enough to keep the old people and economy in its current state alive.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Is a future dominated by kids raised by these families one worth going through all this effort for?

        As I mentioned in another comment, one of the conservatives I know put their kid in a captain America outfit yesterday cuz he was “defending America”.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                The system which is made up of a bunch of kids raised in brainwashed conservative households.

                I feel like this is, in part, voluntarily abstaining from passing your values down to the next generation, which night not have the intended effect.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It won’t matter when abortion is illegal and rape goes unpunished.

    The future is hell for everyone.

  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yeah, and men who support women’s right. Need to support this as well.

    Seriously, look at recent events in Texas. Having sex with women while republicans are in power. It is a potential death sentence for those women.

    Unless you can groove beyond doubt, one off you is infertile. And honestly, given the way some republicans are. Only trust your own eyes on the microscope when checking. Because forcing doctors to lie to women is far from beyond some of these people.

    Honestly, leaving the US for a more liberal nation is the only safe option the way things are looking.

  • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This just makes “incels”, who are known to be too intellectually inadequate to get a clue. I wouldn’t put it past them to vote away your right to say no first.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Once the birth rate drops enough, it won’t matter how many incels there are, the economy crashes without kids.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Given that the new agenda is to end birth control, no-fault divorce and spousal rape laws, a lot of women are about to have no say past the first one. Don’t get married, and if you’re in a bad marriage try to get out ASAP.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        So what happens when we have a generation of kids almost entirely raised by the 44% of women who voted for Trump into brainwashy conservative families? I already see enough 5 year olds attending trump boat parades and the such to give me concern. A conservative I know dressed their kid up as Capt America yesterday because they were “defending America” after the election.

        Seems like it’d suck if an entire generation was raised in these families.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          So it’d hasten Idiocracy? Kinda a IBDYBD problem I suppose.

          Seriously though, I think the key would be to drive enough engagement with this so that this in combination with the obvious financial hardships that everyone’s facing completely annihilates the birth rate.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I googled IBDYBD and the best I got was irritable bowel disease, lmao. I have no clue what that means, can you fill me in?

            I don’t see the trump voters going for this at all is the problem.

  • xor@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    so, because punishing all women is bad, it’s a good idea to punish all men?
    here’s an alternative: don’t fuck republicans… they’re the ones trying to control women.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I give it about 6 months of this strategy before conservative men will be paid to pretend to be leftists in order to impregnate women, so I understand the “don’t fuck any man” strategy.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      It’s not punishing anyone as much as asserting our bodily autonomy, but go off. Targeting Republicans means no pressure is applied to anyone else to change society. Not every woman will participate in the strike. The effects of it have to be wide reaching.

      It’s a widespread denial of the institutions behind gender relationships. Saying that the system is dangerous for women and refusing to participate in it.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        but go off.

        oh look, zero chance that you’re actually trying to have a conversation… yaaay internet.

        Not every woman will participate in the strike.

        almost none will, but if they did, it’s not going to be republican women….

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They were likely telling you to go off because the not all men argument is unnecessary and pedantic. Obviously it’s not all men, but it’s enough of them that nobody should have to specify only the misogynists, racists, rapists, etc.

          It has always been bizarre to me that good people lump themselves in with them. You don’t have to be defensive! You can understand nuance!