I genuinely do not know who the bad guys are. S lot of my leftist friends are against Israel, but from what I know Israel was attacked and is responding and trying to get their hostages back.

Enlighten me. Am I wrong? Why am I wrong?

And dumb it down for me, because apparently I’m an idiot.

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Depends really. What do you value in your life? What ethical framework do you use? Do you value freedom and self determination, do you value people different from you as much as people of your nationality/race? Or perhaps do you value the Western stability, growth, dominance and wellbeing at the expense of the economic South more? There’s no objective answer, it depends on you and your viewpoint.

    If we do away with the propaganda and misinformation we are left with this question. Because the US and Europe would never support anyone for the sake of them being the only democracy in the middle east or fighting terrorists or whatever. If that were the case the US wouldn’t have been complicit with the dictatorships of the gulf countries or any other of the innumerable dictatorships they have established throughout the years in the world. And they would also not be funding the ISIS or other terrorist groups in Columbia, Cuba, Nicaragua and so many other countries.

    No dominant organisation in the world like the US state would give a significant amount of money(like it does for Israel) for something that doesn’t serve their material interests, namely the perpetuation and/or increase of their power and influence.

    So what do you value? Freedom and dignity for all, or more power for the Western states and corporations (- and whatever religious crap you want to excuse colonising and ethnically cleansing a nation)?

    If you see this, it’d save you a lot of time from arguing about every single event of the conflict. If you see every human in the world as equal and deserving of freedom, then you’d see that Israel and the West is bringing these people at the brink of extinction, torturing, killing, humiliating, starving them, expelling them from their land, destroying their vital civil infrastructure, stealing their land and property for 75 years now. And when you see all this (not from Western mainstream media though), you’d recognise the right for armed struggle against a colonizing entity that Israel is. No civilian casualties are acceptable, but the ones affected in 7/10/23 would have to turn against their government for ethnically cleansing Palestinians, bringing them to that desperate point of retaliation, not Palestinians.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      No dominant organisation in the world like the US state would give a significant amount of money(like it does for Israel) for something that doesn’t serve their material interests, namely the perpetuation and/or increase of their power and influence.

      I disagree with the notion that dominant organizations would never give significant of money away in a manner contrary to their material interests. If anything, the opposite is true: if you are dominant, then you have more freedom to get away with acting against your material interests (intentionally or not).

      I think that our treatment of Israel is an example of this. All of the money we have been throwing at them does not buy anything at all, since the Israeli government does not even seem to be that grateful for it but just expects it as a matter of course. They seem hell-bent on bringing the entire region into a war that would pull us in and cause a ton of damage to our material interests, and we have barely any ability to stop them from doing this. Worst, this situation is entirely avoidable because we could, at the very least, put strings on our military aid and then enforce them, rather than just giving Israel whatever it wants and ignoring whenever it crosses any of our supposed lines.

      Just to be clear, I am not arguing that our material interests are the only reason to care about what is happening or to criticize our government’s actions, I am just saying that it makes no sense to just take as given that a dominant organization will always act in its own best material interests in this way.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        US leaders repeatedly tell you why supporting Israel is in the US’s interests: its a giant unsinkable aircraft carrier in the middle east to project power on this resource rich region. The US would never support even another colonialist project with the same values, unless it was in its material interests.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Undermining of independent states in the middle east is in the material interest of the US empire. They just disagree internally about how to best go about doing this. A regional war is not directly against US ruling interests unless they think they would lose that fight or if it would shut down the Strait of Hormuz for a long time. The US has not exactly reined in its Israeli attack dog in any meaningful way, which us what they could do and would do if they wanted descalation.

        It’s not in the interests of the wider civilian population of the planet, or even just those in the US, but those things barely register for empire.

        • bitcrafter@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          The problem with this reasoning is that instability, whether as the result of undermining governments or regional wars, has unpredictable outcomes. For example, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Iran seemed like a great idea to those in power in the U.S. at the time when we disagreed with Iran’s policies, but this decision turned around to bite us when that got overturned. So it is not in our material interests to promote instability, and I think that the current administration knows this, so to the extent it is supporting Israel with effectively no conditions on its actions I think that it is behaving irrationally rather than maliciously.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            The US Empire barely cares about blowback, they subscribe for a maximalist foreign policy pressure ethos. Like in Domino Theory, they abhor independence lest it coherently spread, and act swiftly and decisively against it like playing whack-a-mole. The ethos doesn’t have to deliver perfect results free of blowback, it just needs to be good enough for the interests it serves. Regarsing Iran, this is why it is co stantly threatened and sanctiobed by the US and its cronies. The blowback was too successful so they are still just doing a maximum pressure campaign and constantly threatening war. They take a similar approach against Syria and Yemen. They took a similar approach against Iraq and likely will again.

            When speaking of material interest and the US state, using “our” can be ambiguous. I am not of the ruling class of the US, and certainly nowhere near the great financiers and imperialists whose interests are the real ones served by empire. So I would never say this serves “our” interests using this kind of logic. Are you of that class? Often actions are taken against the interests of the non-ruling classes and in favor of the ruling class.

            One can make an argument that the citizen US working class is a beneficiary of imperialism, paying far below what they should for imports and having wages propped up by the petrodollar, buy this is challenging to rationalize with the idea that it is simply in their interest to, say, keep Iran subservient to US empire. The public are ignorant to these things and there is no mechanistic connection between their actions and these outcomes except the propaganda appaeatus that manufactures their consent, which is really a top-down monopoly on information that still does not inform them of how this might be in their interest. And even then, it is arguable whether this is more generally in their interest. Undermining the petrodollar might lead to their yolk being removed.

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            So it is not in our material interests to promote instability

            When hasn’t the US used the british strategy of balkanization, especially in the middle east? Divide and conquer a cornerstone of their strategy, in the ME, africa, south america, SE asia… literally everywhere.

            Mossadegh’s government was actively overthrown by the CIA, then the US supported the Shah and his son, and had strong relations with imperial Iran until they were overthrown in the Iranian revolution. The Iranian people refused to accept that right-wing US-puppet and his brutal regime any longer, and there was nothing the US could do about it.

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Asking lemmy.ml if Israel is bad is not a great idea if you actually want a nuanced/balanced answer. Honestly, I’d recommend just taking your research elsewhere and steering clear of social media on this one.

  • Red5@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    If you ignore the 80 years of oppression that preceded the Hamas attacks on Israel last year, the Israeli response has been one of genocidal intent. From indiscriminate bombings to cutting off supplies of food, water and other aid. They have directly killed at least 40k people, and likely many more from starvation and preventable diseases.

    This could have been easily avoided by a simple prisoner swap. Israel has thousands of Palestinians detained without charge, and Hamas wanted to free them.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      The 40k number has been steady since early this year. This is not because Israel stopped its mass murder campaign. Instead, it is because they have destroyed the reporting apparatus itself, killing healthcare workers and bureaucrats in a civilian-targeted ethnic cleansing campaign. There is nobody there to do the counts. The hospitals are largely bombed out. Israel targets all aid workers; there is nobody from international orgs to do the counts.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I mean the whole reason why you are confused is that this is the most complex conflict in the world and here (like everywhere else) you are going to get responses in both directions. I suggest you read what each side has to say for itself: for unconditional pro-Israeli propaganda I suggest https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/ and for unconditional pro-Palestinian propaganda I suggest https://mondoweiss.net/ – read both of these and decide for yourself what arguments on both sides you believe more.

    I do not think there are any truly good guys in the conflict; but I do think that Israel is worse and tend to side with the Palestinians. This is mainly because Israel is the side with vastly more power and I think it’s up to the powerful, the oppressor, to try to treat the people they have power over with dignity and try to give up the power they have.

    Of course, even that argument of mine has a counter-argument! You can (and should!) read it here: https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-parameters-of-discussion-michael.html

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It is not complex at all, it is just genocidal settler colonialism and resistance to it. “Complexity” is just a proxy for being uncomfortable acknowledging this, which is something you should do some introspection on as someone from a German instance. Ever hear of the Holocaust? Of Lebensraum?

      Never again means never again for anyone.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          What legitimacy do you see in Israeli Apartheid? Because, long story short, that’s what the Israeli side is selling.

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I’m not here for a drawn out debate. I think Israel’s settlement program is a major reason why there is no peace and I would find Israel a lot easier to defend if they weren’t doing it. It is only one piece of the puzzle though.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Maybe provide examples? I see nothing that would prevent me from saying that with a straight face. There, lemme just…

          Mondoweiss isn’t unconditional pro-Palestine propaganda. It’s a well-sourced pro-Palestinian news site.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Maybe provide examples? I see nothing that would prevent me from saying that with a straight face.

            Gee, I don’t know, I vaguely recall a (perhaps minor) news item happening on the 7th, something about a music festival? I may be misremembering though, since this very impartial news site has no mention of it whatsoever.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              So omission bias? All this fanfare for omission bias? Nobody is using Mondoweiss as their primary news source; they have no reason to report on everything, especially an event like Nova music festival was reported on by everyone and their mother.

              • belastend@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                Mondoweiss is using the same kind of euphemisms around the 7.10 that the rest of the press is using for Israels crimes.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Everyone who opposes genocide, colonialism, and terrorism are the good guys, so neither Israel or Hamas.

    But Hamas is not Palestine/Palestinians, the same way that Israel/Zionism is not Jewish/Judaism; no matter how much Israel, Hamas, the media, or military industrial complex tries to conflate them all.

    IMO Israel is more to blame than Hamas as they should know better given a) their history of persecution b) their significantly greater wealth and education, and c) their demographics — more than half of all Palestinians are technically children, below 18.

    • mbtrhcs@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Don’t forget that Hamas has been supported by Netanyahu in the past because they are a useful tool to prevent a longer standing peace…

  • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Every person I’ve talked to that had some real qualifications on that topic says that Israel are the good guys and the people of Palestine are caught in the crossfire of the war.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Every “qualified” person you talked to says the ethnic supremacist apartheid settler colonists are the good guys?

      Which Nazi bars do you hang out in?

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Funny you call me “Nazi” when you’re apparently the antisemite who wants to see the state of Israel destroyed.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          The state of Israel is an apartheid ethnostate. No apartheid ethnostate should exist, just like it is good that apartheid South Africa no longer exists and was displaced through armed resistance, negotiations, and a plebiscite.

          So, tell me which Nazi bars you hang out in where the only “qualified” people are pro-ethnostate.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Are the real qualifications a caliper set and an unwillingness to talk about what they used to do before they got a position in the west German military?

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        No, the qualifications are people who have studied that conflict for decades and journalists that have been to Gaza and Israel themselves.

        I value their opinion significantly higher than the opinion of people on Lemmy that haven’t taken 5 minutes out of their day to read up on the conflict.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          And all these people think Israel are the good guys? I wonder what their opinions about apartheid South Africa were at the time.

          Israel was explicitly founded as a settler-colonial project, you can look up quotes from famous founding zionists.

          “You are being invited to help make history … it doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen, but Jews … How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial.”

          Theodore Herzl to a Rhodesian representative

          • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            So, because the foundations were colonial, we should … kill everyone living in said country?

            Is that a serious argument? Because then we have a lot of places to eradicate.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              First off, the foundations remain the same, colonial.

              Second off, is creating a secular democracy without an apartheid system, aka “destroying Israel” going to kill everyone? Did the collapse of apartheid South Africa kill all the white people there?

              • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                The collapse didn’t. But the goal or “Mission” of the Hamas is to eradicate all jews.

                So yes, Israel falling would result in the eradication of a vast majority of the Jewish people.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  But the goal or “Mission” of the Hamas is to eradicate all jews.

                  Source that isn’t from the 90s when they were a marginal fundamentalist group and not a leading member of a coalition fighting for a secular democracy?

  • fart_pickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s a terrorist organization vs terrorist state. The only good guys are the civilians dying on both sides.

  • GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Just leave it alone, cause they can’t see eye to eye. There ain’t no good guys. There ain’t no bad guys. There’s only Jews and Ps and they just disagree.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    The Middle East has been cooking for so long, it’s impossible to point at a faction that is the “Good Guys”. But right now, one faction is hell-bent on exterminating another nation’s people, both military and civilian, so it should be pretty fucking obvious who the worst “Bad Guys” are. There are no good guys, only victims.

    You should read Ramzi Yousef’s statement at his 1998 trial. Terrorist factions like Hezbollah and Hamas exist only because Israel is consistently refusing to make peace through diplomacy.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      How about not calling the municipal governments of populations targeted with genocide ‘terrorists’ unless you’re one of the nazis trying to use that as an excuse to exterminate them?

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    On one side we have Israel; a very ironic imperialist nation, who’s leaders, military, and not insignificant number of civilians are behaving a lot like, if not a little worse than, the nazis that they had a history with. I’d also say hypocritical besides ironic.

    The other side we have Hamas; an organisation that, in their 25 articles which explain why they’re doing what they’re doing, state they wish to kill ALL Jews everywhere, that Jewish people are responsible for all the world’s problems (standard Jewish conspiracy stuff, with a solid helping of Holocaust denial), that they are the one true believers of the Islamic faith, and that they’ll create an oppressive, religious controlled government that upholds “traditional family values” and completely takes away all rights from women (I remember reading they say the idea that women are free to do what men do is “Western corruption”).

    The war needs to end, and the Palestinians need to be able to just live without getting oppressed. But I don’t see either side winning as a good thing.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Hamas_charter

      Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity. Hamas rejects the persecution of any human being or the undermining of his or her rights on nationalist, religious or sectarian grounds.

      Note that Hamas is not the only Palestinian faction, but as the one everyone sees fighting Israel, the other factions, and the people of Gaza support them. When the people of Palestine are no longer fighting for their existence, I have no doubt they will support more secular factions as they did before.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Just count the dead, injured, displaced, starved, and dehydrated on either side. You’ll find pretty quickly the numbers are extremely disproportionate. If that’s a baseline consideration for your judgment then you should think on that.

    • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Nope. That only shows how competent or well equipped the side, we are speaking about, is. That there are much less dead or wounded Israelians cannot be attributed to Hamas. They are the same murderous, genocidal fucks as the Israelian government.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’ve made no claims about the ethics of Hamas here. Simply put, genocide is not an act of strategy, and putting the ethics of retaliation aside, does nothing to further the security of your own citizens. Israel has not made its people safer, rather the opposite. It has paved the road to open war with other nations, and is walking it.

    • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I generally agree that the response seems lopsided. However, I also find it odd that Hamas simply hasn’t returned the hostages. This to me signifies two possibilities- they are not actually interested in peace, or they don’t believe that returning the hostages will stop Israel’s destruction.

      Would that appraisal of the situation seem reasonable?

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Not really. Israel has a vested interest in continuing this land grab. The hostages are a convenient excuse, but separate from the inciting event. Furthermore it’s just as likely the hostages have been killed in israeli bombings.

        • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          I see. So you think Israel wants the hostages to be kept in order to give them a public excuse to continue their campaign?

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            No. I said they’re a convenient excuse. If they were to return then a new excuse would be found. The impetus for this campaign started as “self defense” in response to the Oct 7 attack. Then when that was no longer sufficient to justify things they moved onto the hostages as a bargaining chip.

      • finkrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        There is a lot more to this way than just the hostage situation - Israel has been in control of Palestinian territory for a long time (they consider it theirs) and they have been fighting with the Hamas organization for years now. This is the single worst escalation of it.

        Hamas doesn’t want peace. The status quo is domination of Palestine under Israel government - erasure of Palestine effectively if they laid down arms and disbanded. They want liberty, and payback for hardships.

        There isn’t reason to believe Israel will stop the attacks on return of the hostages, as they have gone overwhelmingly above and beyond the total damage done by Hamas (even comparing women and children victims vs. the concert raid that started it all) and given Netanyahu’s far right government is at the helm, so your second point has merit.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Hamas wants to trade those hostages for Palestinian hostages. Which have been imprisoned for decades.

        It is a tale of “Israel started it” and the Palestinians have no other possible way to make demands from Israel than using the same tactics.

        Israel openly says they will continue the destruction. Even if Hamas releases the hostages. Their government does not care about hostages. But the Israeli people do. Hamas would be giving up the only leverage they have against Israel by releasing the hostages.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I think the problem with that is you shouldn’t judge either side by the numher of casualties they’ve committed but rather the casualties they would commit if they could. I legitimately think if Hamas could kill every last Jew in Israel with the push of a button they probably would. Or at least, every Jew that refused to leave the middle east.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        This is absolutely false, hamas is not anti-semitic, they’re anti-zionist. You’re doing the british / murican tabloid thing of equating the two.

        1. Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.
      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Fine but why does one potential future genocide justify the realized genocide currently under way?

  • NastyNative@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    They are the israeli and Palestinians civilians that just want peace. The majority of the people in these 2 countries just want peace. A year+ of war is not ez or good for anything.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      It’s not two countries and you have a delusional idea of what the average settler is like if you think they want peace. Crossing the line to nazi apologia.

      Unless of course you’re saying that the Muslim population, which is the suppressed majority under the evil apartheid state, want peace. Then and only then would you be correct.

      • NastyNative@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        We see the majority of israelis on TV as for this war. The reality is that most of them rather have peace. Its a few really bad apples that are pusing for this genocide. You really think an israel wants war on all their front? Bombs falling on their cities. War is always a few old men arguing and a shit load of young men dying. If we were just to get rid of the people pushing for this including US weapons manufacturers. This war would be over tomorrow!

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Get out of your mind palace. What makes sense for you in abstract is not how things always are and certainly they are not in this instance. Look at the polling for how they see the genocide. They are overwhelmingly in support of it. Look at the dynamic of the West Bank. People move there specifically to steal land. This is a self selecting group of people. It is a nazi country.

          • NastyNative@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I’m in no way supporting Israel on their genocide. I’m not in isreal and I have not seen pollings. I’m going by the conversation Ive had with jewish people here in the us and they tell me all the time. They are not in favor of the war and neither are their families in Israel. The settlers and the army don’t represent most people in Israel thats all I’m saying.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Okay well I believe that but please please please don’t conflate Jewish people and the fascist state of Israel again