• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    FYI: if you are an active apologist for Stallman in this thread, you will be indefinitely banned from Beehaw. to the extent that Stallman has salient critiques of anything he’s under fire for (as @[email protected] notes), his use of those critiques is almost exclusively to advance horrible, indefensible, actively harmful ideas. if you actually care about the merits of these subjects, nothing he argues is actually best argued from him. almost anybody else would be better served as a mouthpiece.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aside for all his pedophile view points, he is correct about infantilizing 12-17 year olds. We have helicopter parents removing every roadblock for children, they grow up not knowing how to plan or resolve conflict.

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Aside for all his pedophile view points, he is correct about infantilizing 12-17 year olds.

        …you’re just repeating my point back to me, and why Stallman is the worst mouthpiece for this position.