• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      To add more detail to the other reply, it’s only entrapment if they coerce you into doing something you wouldn’t have otherwise done.

      A cop comes up to you and goes ‘bro, lets go steal that car!’ would probably be entrapment.

      Cops putting a car on a street waiting for someone to steal it wouldn’t be.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But this would be like a car that has the keys in the ignition and a sign making you aware of that fact.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, that’s basically what a trap car is, and those have been litigated to the point it’s very clear that it’s not entrapment and totally allowed.

          I mean you have to be kind of stupid to see an expensive car sitting there with the keys in the ignition and go ‘BRO! New ride!’, but ‘stupid’ isn’t a criminal defense (so far anyways) and nobody MAKES them get in the car, start it, and drive off.

        • GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thats the point. A stand up citizen wouldnt even care. they may notice a easily stealable item but will just walk by.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Generally not. Entrapment is very specific, and leaving you the option of doing something illegal without pushing you to do it is decidedly not entrapment.