• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we’re forced to have capitalism, can we at least use the social kind?

    A social market economy is a free-market or mixed-market capitalist system, sometimes classified as a coordinated market economy, where government intervention in price formation is kept to a minimum, but the state provides significant services in areas such as social security, health care, unemployment benefits and the recognition of labor rights through national collective bargaining arrangements. Source

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally have no problem with capitalism dealing with non essentials, but essentials should be nationalized.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my opinion, using terms like ‘capitalism’ or ‘socialism’ or ‘fascism’ is a losing game for anyone except the Right.

      The second you use those terms you get forced into a fight about the definitions and get sidetracked from the actual issues at hand.

      Substitute other terms instead. Don’t say “Why can’t we have Socialist healthcare like Sweden?” say “why can’t we have the kind of health care Eisenhower offered in 1956?”

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I am going to disagree with you on this. Here’s why:

        No one forces anyone to fight about anything. It’s a choice you make. If you find yourself in a conversation with someone who is unwilling to hear reason, then you can choose to continue or you can walk away.

        I also disagree with avoiding certain words simply because you’re concerned how other people will react to them (of course exceptions apply). Now if you can find a simpler, less controversial, way to express yourself, by all means keep it simple. Using “$5 words” in an attempt to make yourself sound smart or better than somebody else is counterproductive. And, in most cases whether you talk about “Socialist healthcare in Sweden” or “health care Eisenhower offered” is moot, because a bad actor is going to twist your words regardless.

        Finally, in the context of this thread, we are specifically talking about Capitalism, so it makes little sense to skirt around the term. Some might as well embrace it and explore it as far as we can.

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with this approach, most people hate politics. They either have an aversion to words like these or, use them incorrectly.

        I think a very large part of educating, agitating and organizing is meeting people where they are. Once they get over their aversion, one would hope they will become class conscious.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. Trying to force people to use your terminology only makes them resent you.

          Put your argument in terms they understand.