• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I mean, it probably will eventually, but that has nothing to do with LLMs, nor is it a technology that I want to exist.

    I can definitely see a world where lobbyists for automakers and insurance companies create such a financial and regulatory burden, where only the wealthy can afford to drive their own cars, if they choose to. Where as everyone else must rent or lease their self driving car as is if it’s a IaaS or SaaS subscription.

    But none of that has anything to do with using LLMs for the tasks they can accomplish, or telling people to stop bitching about them not being able to complete the tasks they aren’t good at, or even capable of.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was saying that this is investment money wasted on an empty promise. Like the full self driving feature

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who’s talking about investing…? I’ve exclusively been talking about what LLMs can do now, today, for free (aside from energy costs).

        None of what your throwing out there has anything to do with what’s being discussed here. It’s a red herring.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you living under a rock?

          Both openai’s llm development and Tesla’s FSD projects have been given billions in investment. Both, as far as we can tell, are an empty promise.