• hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you reversed the gender on this you’d the comment section would be a combination of roasting the hypothetical dude and complaining how trashy the shirt is.

    I don’t even think the double standard is related to sexism. I think you’re all horny degenerates who are emotionally stunted to the point where any woman implying anything sexual breaks your mind.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Depends on what ya mean by large, if ya mean for example broad shoulder with somewhat odd muscle distribution maybe. But no most folks are just overweight, I have both I am five foot five so its actually accentuated somewhat.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I thought the same thing and I’m still not convinced that’s not what’s going on. I remember in the '90s so many people were putting chains to their wallets, you know wear your money is… Well your cell phone is probably attached to one of your accounts, so it’s money. This weirdly makes sense to me.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it makes perfect sense, and a cool retro throwback. Fashion is cyclical after all! But I think the other poster was correct and she just has it fed through 2 belt loops.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fashion is cyclical after all!

          I just heard today that you’re considered old if you wear ankle socks now. It was the opposite when I was younger, not wearing ankle socks made you look old and out of fashion.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Clearly, our fathers are trying to give her a massive heart attack before our mothers hear about this lady’s affairs.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You didn’t get any replies yet you decided to edit your comment to argue with an imaginary opponent. Mate, take a breath.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        37 downvotes, yet no one brave enough to put their neck on the line and offer a counterpoint. So yh, I made an assumption and yet still no one has made a counterpoint which means I’m probably right 🤷🏼‍♂️

        • cheddar@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If you want to write edgy replies, you have to expect some downvotes. I think that attempts to normalize toxicity and trolling online are absolutely terrible. I know I have to accept that some people are provocateurs, but I don’t have to accept excuses for their poor behavior.

        • Lupus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lol no one cares enough to reply to you mate. The reaction is “what a dork” downvote and forget.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll reply: no one is offering a retort because your comment is weird, pointless, and not worth the time or effort to give a genuine response to. Your edit makes it even more obvious that you just wanted to stir shit and get in bad faith arguments over a silly picture

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You do have to accept that you sometimes have bad takes like errybody else, and this is one of them.

      It’s not because you made a bad joke, its because you lack the emotional intelligence necessary to ask some things:

      • The likely continuous comments on her figure that caused her to wear this retort

      • The fact that if you werent gonna make a comment to her shes not talking to you

      These 2 things are often conflated in folks who haven’t trained their empathy up, and i suspect you feel like you took damage because even tho you’re not in the room your acting like she’s insulted you.

      I know I have to accept that some people are fat

      You don’t, you have to accept your humanity, which means you’re the same ugly mess of hair and stink and poo as the rest of us. Somebody thinks you’re ugly. Someone out there thinks you’re a piece of shit. I think you’re just young. You need to understand your place, and you straight up fuckin’ dont.

      To be a bit unfair youre probably a little too full of yourself, you’ll get over it if you put in work.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      anything that attempts to normalise obesity is absolutely terrible

      Boy have you missed the boat on that one. By several decades.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      your retort sucks because you’re trying to own her by saying something she already acknowledges. weak af.

      “I’m fat because I fucked your dad”

      “oh yeah? well you’re fat!”

      “I bet you fucked my dad a lot!”

      genius insults

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        People seem to love to jump to this assumption without acknowledging any fallibility, when in reality you don’t know from just looking at someone. Even if it’s a likely reason, it’s not the only one. I’m going to at least hope you aren’t a doctor based on this single sentence.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Excluding weight gain from corticosteroids or something exotic like elephantiasis, it is literally always overeating. I’m prone to it, and nobody can consider it an individual moral failing when obesity has become a massive global epidemic. But there’s genuinely no getting around the fundamental reality that it’s calories in, calories out. Apparently the majority of humans overeat when living a sedentary lifestyle with a readily available food surplus. The incredible success of GLP-1 agonists really hammers that point home if anyone was still unconvinced.

          • kofe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            “excluding [things I know about], it is literally always [the only other thing I know about.]” Again, I stress fallibility.

              • kofe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Look, I’ve tried taking a day to reply because this comment pissed me off so much. I watched my mother count calories as a kid and it emotionally scarred me. She wasn’t suffering from the examples you gave. I don’t care to share personal details and shouldn’t have to for you to be aware you may not know everything.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lemmy is full of socially maladapted terminally online autists who literally do not understand how humor works.