• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Accute Love Triangle: Two people who are boning, but they wistfully pine for a third person from afar.

    Obtuse Love Triangle: Two people pinning for the same third, when they’d be better off hooking up with each other.

    Equilateral Love Triangle: When there is no age-gap discourse in the polycule.

    Right Love Triangle: When the odd-couple finds the perfect person to square them off.

    Stereographically Projected Love Triangle: A romantic Isekai

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Non-euclidean love triangle: Both people who are currently together wish they were with the same third person who lives too far away for a relationship to work.

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s some Interesting graph theory problem somewhere in here about finding out if a network of N people in M relationships must include at least one gay person.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even numbers are pretty easy to solve at least. They can be straight or lgbt.

      I posit that any love shape that includes an odd number of participants requires some form of deception, or at least one LGBT person in order to be valid.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      A relationship graph which requires no gay relationships is called bi(partite).

      That follows because if you can two color the graph so that edges only connect different colors, you just assign male to one color and female to the other.

      This means there’s a tone of mathematical identities describing this. Wikipedia has a good introduction.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartite_graph

      • DaGeek247@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Very neat. But the fun part of this is that if you’re poly/into more than one person, you are now a part of the LGBT group, not the straight one.

        Note the above image, where the triangle shape requires that every person be into another person, with the tension being that if it’s cishet, they have to choose only one person.

        We aren’t checking to see if a shape with LGBT people works, we know those do. We are checking to see if a cishet triangle is even possible.

        • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          isn’t cis het an identity, therefore someone could identify as heterosexual an be in a polycule, only fucking members of the opposite sexual.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes. My girlfriend’s husband is cishet, it has nothing to do with his willingness to have multiple partners, just the fact that he’s an amab man who exclusively is attracted to women. His wife happens to be pansexual and dating a lesbian, but that has no impact on his orientation

        • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A relationship isn’t LGBT; a person is. A cishet man who has two bi/pan female partners who date each other isn’t LGBT because his partners are queer.

  • OutOfMemory@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The classic love triangle was with Arthur, Lancelot, and Guinevere, where both guys wanted the girl but were also best friends. Does that not qualify?

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I vote that it should. Sounds like good drama, the kind you’d expect seeing a love-triangle tag on a fancfiction site.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Technically the triangle just refers to ‘relationships’ and not ‘romantic relationships’ so two male friends and one female love interest works as a triangle but one woman with two male strangers doesn’t with because that’s just a V.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is the standard of the love triangle. The two love rivals have to be friends with, or at least know, each other or else there is no tension between them for their love of the 2nd party. Or else every person talking to multiple people on dating apps is in a love n-gon. And love should never intersext with n-gons.

  • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If the love triangle in question does not have the potential for a threesome, it is not a triangle.

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If we’re just talking math, triangles can be defined in terms of 3-element subsets of all 3 (A)ngles and 3 (S)ides:
    SSS - unique
    SAS - unique
    ASS - may be unique depending on the lengths of the sides
    ASA - unique
    SAA - unique
    AAA - infinite solutions

    Maybe someone cleverer than me can figure out how that maps on to love and gender.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bunch of insecure men who dislike feminist takes. I got banned for posting something similar, despite being the proud owner of some bullocks.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not sure if the testicles you’re referring to are in your pants or attached to mooing bovines in your fields. I’m not sure I need to know, because I’m sufficiently amused by the ambiguity, but if you want to tell me more about the testicles, I’m here for you.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I love everything about this comment: the bemused tone, the bovines, the offer for moral support. It has it all.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              You made me smile so hard and I nearly burst out laughing, but I surpressed it because otherwise I would have to explain to my wife, and I’m not sure I can.

              But however many testicles there are, and wherever you’re keeping them, know that I forever support your pride in those surely magnificent danglies of yours.