• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yep, you’re right that she wouldn’t win and you would be propping up Trump by voting for her. I don’t see any “liberals” saying she’ll stop the genocide, either. I only see you bringing up that point in this thread.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Read the thread, there are plenty of people on this thread pretending Harris will be better for Palestine, which is a lie.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are two people, by definition one is better. So you saying her being better is a lie must mean you think Trump is better. Which is insane.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is a new level of liberal gymnastics, lmao.

          Materially, if Trump and Kamala approve the same genocidal weapon shipments, regardless of their individual feelings, what changes? Do you think Trump has fascist magic that makes the bombs Kamala promised to send anyways more deadly?

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, but if you look beyond a single isolated thing you’re crusading for your realize that sending weapons over seas isn’t the only power the president has. The president can make the world much worse beyond a single conflict in the middle east.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              A bit nasty to describe genocide as “a single conflict in the middle east,” but regardless, the GOP and DNC are aligned on foreign policy.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Nasty? Is it multiple conflicts, is it not in the middle east? Or are you just mad and want to use inflammatory words to drive a discussion off feelings not reality.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The reality is that it’s genocide, using passive language is a rhetorical strategy to downplay the internationally recognized genocide.

                  • Lightor@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I’m not down playing anything, it’s you assuming and wanting to be extreme. Why don’t you call it the murder of innocent children, are you trying to play it down by using a single word?

                    Jesus, it’s not even about the issues with people like you, it’s just an excuse to feel righteous and go after people.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not what you said. You originally said “cease the genocide”, which neither candidate will do and no one here is saying otherwise.

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            He will make it worse, because he is a fascist. It’s not magic, basic knowledge of how congress and fascism work. Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t make it “magic”.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              So if a fascist takes office, bipartisan agreemants based on preset budgets magically shift, and cause the shipments to increase in magnitude? Sounds like magic to me.

              • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Those budgets get changed constantly, and if you think Trump and the GOP won’t change them you’re a bigger idiot than I initially realized.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The GOP is aligned with the DNC in this matter, the DNC is not blocking anything nor is the GOP pushing for more. Both are in agreement. If the GOP gets more congress seats, the anti-genocide section of the DNC still can’t change anything.