Oh hey, also the same thing with environmental issues

  • davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not quite, it isn’t, not in overall message, and if you read what I said, you’ll see that I didn’t object to any additional help, I just insist on substantial cash first and reject most firmly your absurd histrionics about inflation.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not quite, it isn’t, not in overall message

      Listen, I may have been horrible at phrasing what I’m saying, but that’s legitimately what I’ve been trying to argue. The difference I guess is that I’m anticipating the possible negative outcomes and saying they should be resolved simultaneously instead of just saying “throw money at them”.

      you’ll see that I didn’t object to any additional help, I just insist on substantial cash first

      Okay, sooooo… Again, apparently I was bad at explaining myself, but that’s basically what I was trying to say, just that instead of cash now, resolve issues later, I think that you should resolve the possible issues at the same time.

      reject most firmly your absurd histrionics about inflation.

      Why is it hard to believe that rich people will happily destroy the world if it means they get an extra dollar or two? They’re already doing it. Recent history has firmly established that rich people are consistently among the worst human beings that humanity has to offer. They would unironically feed a baby into a blender if that meant their company ran 0.1% more efficiently. That’s why I’m convinced they’ll just fuck people over again. You have to either remove them from the equation as well, or at the very least, quarantine them so their obscene wealth and influence can’t hurt anyone in the real world.

      And we can make it quick bby. It doesn’t have to take long~.