• मुक्त@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    phone number isn’t just any metadata; it is the anchoring data around which the rest of metadata is collected, and it is also connected to govt/corporate verified real identity.

    why would anyone even claim to offer privacy around such an anchor ?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly, especially when we’re talking about the US government that has access to all the data from other large US based media companies like Google and Meta. We know this for a fact thanks to Snowden leaks. Once you have a phone number, you know the identity of the person, and you can trivially cross reference all the other data to see if that person is of interest. And thanks to their Signal connection graph, the government can easily tell what other people they communicate privately with.

      • zingo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And thanks to their Signal connection graph, the government can easily tell what other people they communicate privately with.

        So what? I’m sure your neighbor couple talk privately to each other most of the time and you know that happens. The important part is that the conversation is private.

        Signal is not an anonymous messenger app. It never claimed to be. It’s for you to have a private conversation where your device holds the encryption keys.

        Not like WhatsApp, where Meta has access to the keys of all conversations. Also 95 % of the worlds population is on WhatsApp, so why don’t you go and complain to them for lack of privacy and security?

        If you want an “anonymous” chat client they are out there to use. Good luck getting more people onboard other than your savy friend.

        • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Signal’s use case is “authentic communication”. like when a govt person interacts with other govt person and doesn’t want a second govt to snoop on the actual contents on the communication, but accepts that metadata is public.

          It is whatsapp for such people, without being whatsapp.

          But then why would you use whatsapp either ?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you understand that this information is being leaked, and that’s not part of your threat profile that’s perfectly fine. The problem is that a lot of people don’t seem to understand the implications of Signal harvesting phone numbers, and therefore make bad assumptions regarding the safety of using Signal. It’s pretty clear that a lot of people aren’t conscious about this in this very thread in fact.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            yes most people seem oblivious what mass bulk data collection can do.

            and nobody has yet to answer, if there is something to stop Signal from collecting metadata logs of its users and their groups.

            it does not seem people understand this risk.

            either way, nobody produced a reasonable position on this. so presumption is that signal can farm this data and sell/give it out. since best we got is Signal’s responses to US courts which would also be subject to the same conditions if national security type people got involved.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Wire uses Signal protocol and doesn’t harvest phone numbers, so I’m pretty sure we do actually know what the answer is. The fact that Signal made this design choice is very concerning to anybody who understand the implications of doing that.

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                i don’ disagree with the thesis and i think the best we will get is not answer that tan effectively rebuke the position.

                stupid AI said that server would know who start the connection but not back and forth. connection is static and is reset, so presumably longer convos would involve several timestamps.

                I am not sure if signal would know who the recipient but that’s the logical next conclusion.