It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No. I’m just not willing to attribute a COMPANY as the sole owner/stakeholder in a protocol that honestly has very little to do with them.

    Just because Github does something, doesn’t mean that they represent git.

    • Sinthesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just used the most popular/known example. Personally I haven’t liked GitHub since Micro$oft bought them. I’m ol’ school, 25 years in the biz so M$ really really leaves a bad aftertaste in my mouth.

      I’ll answer your other question in the other thread.