• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    idk man explaining relationships seems like a pretty reasonable and normal thing to me, if both people aren’t on the same terms i’m not sure how anybody is expecting it to work otherwise.

    You could subscribe to a “social” relationship standard but that’s stupid.

    • Venti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Explaining what you seek in a relationship is good, doesn’t mean you need to “educate” your partner on what you think love is, everyone has different needs.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Educating your partner on what you think love is, and what you seek in a relationship is good. How can they be expected to know, otherwise?

        • Venti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I guess my english comprehension today failed me because I said the same thing minus the educate part, isn’t the word used in a teaching context? I read OP’s post as someone who has a higher understanding of what a relationship is, which is both weird and untrue since you absolutely can have fireworks/effusive emotions after the honeymoon phase.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            which is both weird and untrue since you absolutely can have fireworks/effusive emotions after the honeymoon phase.

            you definitely can but its never going to be the same as it was during the honeymoon phase, there’s a reason they call it that. Though for me personally there would never be a honeymoon phase lol. I just don’t approach relationships like that.