Derby, CT is a small, working-class, post-industrial town with a population which has been stagnant at about 12,000 for more than six decades.

The geniuses over at the Connecticut DOT decided that this obviously meant that the town’s Main Street needed to be widened, by twice the size, destroying a number of historic buildings and uprooting numerous small community businesses in the process. That red stripe on the far left of the “After” pic is the new edge of the street.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Post-industrial” is just another way of saying that the town has no reason to exist anymore. Bulldozing half the town is half way to finishing the job and that needs to be done.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, fuck the people who live here and likely can’t afford to move elsewhere, amiright? We should just “finish the job” and force them out because we need another highway, damn it! /s

      • Lowpast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        When small towns start disappearing, it’s often because they are no longer economically or socially relevant. Decline of local industries, reduced agricultural activity, lack of job opportunities, population migration…

        The town is clearly on a downward trend. 60 years with no growth is not a positive thing.

        Business owners just don’t randomly sell because the DOT wants to widen a road.

        The town is already gone.

          • Lowpast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            People with drastically more information, data, and money decided this is the right call. These decisions are not made in a box and the town (mayor/chamber of commerce) is always involved.

            What if the reason more people don’t stop in the town is because the narrowwness made it a difficult to visit the town?

            People drastically more involved than any of us decided this is the correct course of action to revitalize the downtown.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              people with drastically more information data and money than me decided to tear up the whole country’s rail networks and start using this shit.

              so I’m sure you’ll forgive me for assuming they’re fucking morons when they do something that looks stupid as shit.

              • Lowpast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                .Assumimg youre refering to the US, fixed rail is not a feasible mode of transportation for 90+% (ignoring something like a subway or monorail) of travel in modern America. Intra-city or between a major metropolis, sure. But that still exists… you can still take them… because the utility of them keeps them alive…

                • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  okay so why the shit were they using it perfectly fine a century ago? with overhead wire?

                  why are there all these abandoned towns and grain elevators and farmland scattered over rural america that no longer works now that the trains can’t get there anymore? why the shit did it work for the deepest most remote ass end of nowhere villages in rural mexico during the diaz administration? why did it work for the USSR-of all their fuckups; they did make trains to rural areas work pretty damn well.

                  you’re repeating bullshit auto industry propaganda. trains may service rural areas differently, but they can be served, and they can be served well. we know this because it’s been done before on I think three continents. do better.

                  • Lowpast@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    I don’t know what sort of copium you’re smoking. I lived in rural Michigan for most of my life. Train is absolutely not a viable mode of transportation for rural America. There’s a reason trains and subways still exist on the east coast of America and in most or Europe, Asia, and south America - they are useful.

                    They died out everywhere else because guess what, they are not ideal at all, and the convenience factor of cars is basically unbeatable. Even if we had a high-speed rail connecting our major cities, okay, how do I get to my destination? Another train? What about when I live 35 miles from the city center… another train…? Sounds absolutely atrocious