It found repositories whose names contained “mini” and “tiny” and made puns with them. I have a fork of a port of SRB2, and it somehow knew it was “a Sonic game on the wrong console”. How the hell?
I mean, like, I know the answer, but like still, how?
That README is about as compelling as a flat soda, and if you’re hoping people will reach out to you, I hate to break it to you—CCing your GitHub just isn’t the professional highlight you think it is. How about focusing on actually developing something noteworthy or learning how to put together a decent readme first? Until then, keep your day job—whatever that is, because coding clearly isn’t your forte.
If your goal was to create a portfolio that screams desperation for attention, then congratulations, you’ve hit the nail on the head. In the vast ocean of developers, you’re more like a puddle—a soggy, uninspired puddle, at that. Keep working on that “Developer™” title; maybe one day, you’ll get an upgrade to “Notable Developer™,” but for now, you’re just a footnote in the GitHub archives.
Not saying my profile is actually any good, but ouch, that stuff still kinda hurts xd
For context: My GitHub bio is just a sarcastic “Developer™”
Your "Typing-Speed-Test" repo? Zero stars—sounds about right. And those "bots" you’ve created? They scream “desperation” louder than a midnight Tinder swipe. At least your attempts at automation are saving you from dignity, too bad they lack any users.
Each project feels like a "hey, look what I did in my room with Python" moment that nobody asked for. Watermarking images to protect your precious "intellectual property"—cute, but you might want to focus on protecting your programming skills instead.
For anyone wondering: https://github-roast.pages.dev
If you want a profile to try, maybe test out Lemmy dev dessalines.
Okay, how the hell did it do that?
It found repositories whose names contained “mini” and “tiny” and made puns with them. I have a fork of a port of SRB2, and it somehow knew it was “a Sonic game on the wrong console”. How the hell?
I mean, like, I know the answer, but like still, how?
When I put in my profile, it found my actual name and interests and roasted them really creatively.
I mean, I did put my actual name in there, but I’m still impressed it did that.
It’s using a Large Language Model. As if you fed ChatGPT a list of the repo info and asked it to write a roast.
I think it’s not actually ChatGPT though, it seems to be using Facebook’s Llama.
It uses OpenAI API. Source: https://github.com/codenoid/github-roast/blob/main/src/routes/llama/%2Bserver.js
Huh. I’m a bit confused why this is in a folder called llama 🤷
Maybe the author just likes llamas?
Don’t try out on your own profile. It’s brutal :-(
It doesn’t quite understand the “fork to make a contribution” angle and makes fun of “too many forks” though.
From my profile’s roast:
Fucking ouch 😂. 10/10 roast.
Yep, its brutal, but for me it was also funny.
Haha I did. But it roasted me for having no stars on repos that were forks used for contributing so not really much of a roast 🤷
Mine is mostly forks, I got savaged for not having a single original thought.
Ha not bad AI.
Not saying my profile is actually any good, but ouch, that stuff still kinda hurts xd
For context: My GitHub bio is just a sarcastic “Developer™”
It is fucking brutal
Your "Typing-Speed-Test" repo? Zero stars—sounds about right. And those "bots" you’ve created? They scream “desperation” louder than a midnight Tinder swipe. At least your attempts at automation are saving you from dignity, too bad they lack any users. Each project feels like a "hey, look what I did in my room with Python" moment that nobody asked for. Watermarking images to protect your precious "intellectual property"—cute, but you might want to focus on protecting your programming skills instead.Your “Typing-Speed-Test” repo has one star now bro.