• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    See Orion’s Arm’s explanation:

    https://www.orionsarm.com/xcms.php?r=oa-faq&topic=FTL in OA

    And related concept’s like a wormhole’s failure mode (EG they immediately collapse if ever positioned in a way that allows for actual FTL travel):

    https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/48545a0f6352a

    https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4754be03eb3bc

    Orion’s Arm is really cool because it’s set in the far future, but it tries to limit AI engineering to what’s theoretically possible with current physics (just not with current engineering), and they have good explanations for it all. For example, warp drives are a thing, and theoretically plausible, but they do not allow for FTL travel.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah the explanations in that page are even worse than any of the ones that I get from actual physicists. Several of the explanations say “FTL is not possible because physics” others simply use equations in place of an explanation.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well the jist of it is in one sentence:

        The net result is that I have transmitted a message into my own past.

        Basically, FTL automatically lets you make time machines, and this is bad™. It just doesn’t make any physical sense, so the consensus is bad things happen (like black holes forming) when you actually push against the speed of light, with very reasonable explanations for why this happens.

        The exception is wormholes ,which are theoretically possible “FTL” travel, but only if you are very very careful about where you put them. Otherwise they explode.