• oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The idea of shooting any round at someone and expecting them to survive is absurd, but .223/5.56 is definitely in the range of “reliably fatal if applied to the chest or head” .

      It might not be a “big boy round” but it’s still a rifle round – if wasn’t powerful enough to reliably “incapacitate” (i.e. “kill”) a human being at 100 yards the world’s militaries wouldn’t use it.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        .22LR can readily kill someone, with good shot placement. Basically anything interfering with the heart, brain, or causing substantial leaks of the circulatory system is gonna kill someone.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Real men can shrug off any calibre not designed to punch through car engine blocks.

        Shit, I hear that if you use enough power tools and watch enough sportsball even those liquid copper jet tank boomy things have a hard time getting through the protective crust of sawdust and testosterone.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol power tools… Literally devices made to make hard work easy, so funny that they became this manly symbol.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My point was that if you had to have someone shooting at you would you rather they shot 22lr or 223? Shooting any live round at a target you don’t actually want to injure or kill is stupid, but if you had to you’d want to use the smallest possible bullet to minimize the damage.