• RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t worry trainer, you can always get back together in a big ol’ group of all your friends and between everyone we’ll be able to figure out all their names. :)

      • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Uhhh… The internet? lol

        You can get together with a small group of friends if you’re more comfortable that way, but the sentiment is the same. Find some people and have fun remembering your shared past.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I still have an easier time remembering all the original pokemon than I do the periodic table of elements.

      • The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        that in terms of human companionship, Flareon is objectively the most huggable Pokemon? While their maximum temperature is likely too much for most, they are capable of controlling it, so they can set themselves to the perfect temperature for you. Along with that, they have a lot of fluff, making them undeniably incredibly soft to touch. But that’s not all, they have a very respectable special defense stat of 110, which means that they are likely very calm and resistant to emotional damage. Because of this, if you have a bad day, you can vent to it while hugging it, and it won’t mind. It can make itself even more endearing with moves like Charm and Baby Doll Eyes, ensuring that you never have a prolonged bout of depression ever again.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    After a certain point the Pokemon started being made with the level of creativity and identity you can expect from AI generated garbage, so I don’t blame you for forgetting them.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t remember exactly, but didn’t design change hands pretty early on? The first 151 were designed by a fairly famous character designer, iirc

    • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly I don’t even think gen 1 Pokémon are anymore creative than the others. I was still a kid when the concept was new so they felt fresh, but pretty much every Pokémon I can think of is based on an existing archetype of some sort. Plant/Animal, inanimate object brought to life, spirits, dinosaurs, etc. Then you sprinkle on some regional flavor and there you go, you got a Pokémon.

      “Identity” isn’t something that belongs to the object, it’s something that is assigned to the object by an observer.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is why, in retrospective, I’ve really fallen out of love with Pokémon. I could have spent that time learning about real-world animals and plants, since it’s so arguable, whether Pokémon are even cooler to begin with.

        • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I still love Pokémon, I just try not to let my nostalgia for the old games get in the way of enjoying the new ones. I try to judge everything on its own merit.

          But yeah I agree, really animals are way more complex and interesting than anything you’d find in a game.

        • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Magnemite is named after a magnet and Voltorb is an electric orb.

          Tauros and Porygon are just one letter away from Taurus and polygon.

          Ekans is snake backwards.

          I’m open to having my mind changed, but I’m going to need more lol

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, but after naming my first child Bulbasaur and my second one Venusaur, I’m not sure I can sire enough children to fill in the first 150, let alone the full roster…

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, but after naming my first child Bulbasaur and my second one Venusaur, I’m not sure I can sire enough children to fill in the first 150, let alone the full roster…

        Plus you already forgot Ivysaur!

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They know the most well known Pokémon thanks to merch and a few old cards that my wife and me had when we were children and conserved.

        My oldest watched a few episodes when she was 5, and “read” a Pokémon manga after (she watched the images, she didn’t know how to read). I promised her that I will teach her how to play the cards when she’ll know how to read … I will keep my promise and buy her her own deck for her 7th birthday :-)

        • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s adorable. I’m so excited to be able to share this with my kids too.

          My oldest only knows the name “Charmander” from a stuffed animal, but that’s it.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I got my kiddo playing around 4 or 5. Mainly just watching. Eventually he started playing games like Coromon, and other monster catchers. The newest Pokémon sadly haven’t run well on his switch either, so I’ve been trying to get him on the older but still favorites like Pearl or Diamond.