What is your general attitude towards those who believe in religion whether they are jewish, Muslim, Christian etc etc.

Do you get on well with any religious friends and neighbours?

Have you ever thought of believing in a religion at some point?

If you do not like the faiths, why?

If you DO, also why? Does this come from your family? Maybe something went bad during your life?

I get that Lemmy might have the same stereotype in Reddit that there are loads of atheists, but there’s a good reason why despite criticism of religion, it is still here.

P.S. I am not religious or anti religious in any fashion, I am agnostic.

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    My main point is any philosophy about where humans came from is a matter of faith. I was just pointing out the issue where evolution doesnt sufficiently explain things, but most atheists are aware of this or just handwave away the problem.

    I suppose on picking a religion you would need to look at what makes the most logical sense, and is most consistent. Also I would look at what has the best track record with the best outcome.

    • ianovic69@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      about where humans came from is a matter of faith.

      If that’s your main point then you’re in a great position to examine your beliefs using tried and tested methods to know things.

      Of course, you may have to adjust those beliefs to be in accordance with reality, which can be much more difficult. Should you accept this challenge that life has presented, your chosen subject of evolution has mountains of good evidence to study.

      what makes the most logical sense, and is most consistent…what has the best track record with the best outcome.

      This is interesting use of language that usually applies to the scientific method. I’ve often seen it used in attempts to legitimise religious reasoning, and sometimes it goes with assertions of “proper basic beliefs.”

      You should be aware that these are just more modern methods of things like Pascal’s Wager, that are not meant to convince anyone except those who already believe.

      All religion, at least those with god belief and certainly the Abrahamic three, contain no sensible logic, are completely inconsistent, have a terrible track record and very often horrible outcomes.

        • ianovic69@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Just to be clear, ignoring everything else I said doesn’t somehow make them irrelevant. In fact it does the opposite to any further opposition you may bring later.

          Also, it’s kinda rude.

          As to your question, the track record of those three religions is complete and utter failure. Every time.

          If they can offer any good evidence as answers to the subjects discussed in this post, I’ve yet to hear them. I’m open to being convinced and I try to adjust my beliefs accordingly when presented with good evidence contrary to my current knowledge.

          But there’s been nothing so far.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I didnt ignore what you said, its just pointless to write super long responses to all the subjects, it just gets to be a wall of text.

            Let me be more direct, what is the horrible outcomes that christianity or judism brings?

            • ianovic69@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Super long wall of text? You’re kidding, right? ಠಿ⁠_⁠ಠ

              Look, I even put it in it’s own, separate paragraph

              As to your question, the track record of those three religions to convincingly explain anything they claim to, is complete and utter failure. Every time.

              So, to avoid any confusion before moving on, you didn’t even try to explain your reasoning for the criteria you set out. You didn’t offer any good evidence to justify those criteria, and you dodged replying by pretending it’s too difficult for you.

              This isn’t a good look for you or those who share your beliefs.

              And you’re really asking me to point out terrible things that have come about as a result of religion or been perpetuated through religious belief?

              Off the top of my head -

              Holy wars.
              Witch trials.
              Destruction of indigenous cultures.
              Widespread misogyny.
              Discrimination towards minorities.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                So this was exactly the way I thought you would go so I didnt want to invest a lot of time. Those things you mentioned are not related to christianity, it christians doing things. If you actually understand the bible I would say 4/5 go directly against the bible and the last one is questionable.

                The main issue is that people apply the things that a person of a belief system does to that belief system. For example they will see a Rep or Dem commit a crime and say that the particular party is responsible, or for in your case christianity is responsible for what its people do.

                “But the people are the fruits of what the religion is!” No, they typically are a failing of following the tenants.

                • ianovic69@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Nonsense. We are talking about things people do as a direct result of their beliefs, also known as outcomes. Bait and switching just makes you look even worse.

                  And accusing nearly all Christians of not doing it right is disingenuous, elitist and pitifully sad.

                  Perhaps instead of disgracing yourself further, you can tell us what these tenets are that so many go against?

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    “But the people are the fruits of what the religion is!” No, they typically are a failing of following the tenants.

                    If you dont understand what I am saying then just ask, insulting is just childish.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah that religion is called science. To suggest that gaps exist on evolution so we need to go examine religion is an a joke of an argument. The difference in successful capturing of the reality of the process of life by the theory of evolution to any religion is galactic in scale. Your justification is ridiculous and only exists because you cannot let go of the lies someone taught you as a child in order to control you.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The joke is that you think you follow science and then outright discount things when they are not what you want.

            • hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Around the same certainly that I think balloons exist inside giraffes on the moon of TRAPPIST-1b.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                So this points out how you dont care about science because you are completely close minded. What you will find is that with your group this is common, they will not even begin to admit the possibility of a deity.

                • hglman@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I gave you my assessment of my the possibility, more over the subject has been significantly more explored than the evidence for it. Doing good science is not endlessly chasing any possible outcome, it is rigorously evaluating those you can investigate.

                  That said,

                  There is no god and your a fool, feel fucking bad for you. I’m really sorry people manipulated you as a child to the point your trapped by the idea. Haunted even.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Evolution theory DOES explain where we came from, and the theory is proven billion times over and over. It’s insanity to believe anything else. As Dawkins neatly put it, we have more evidence for evolution theory than we have for Holocaust.

      but most atheists are aware of this or just handwave away the problem.

      No, ‘atheists’ do not handwave problems found in scientific theories away but study it until it’s no longer a problem. What religion does is just says “it must be gods” and throws any reason to thrash bin

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The issue is you guys do handwaving about how the basic building blocks started and then go on to look at fossil progression. You guys need to stop and look at how it seems to be impossible for DNA to develop and how evolution doesnt have a good explaination for it.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          No one is handwaving away problems we are yet to solve, except the people just claiming “must have been gods”

          There has always been and probably always will be new problems to solve. Scientists have been working on trying to understand and resolve those problems, and we know so much more today than we did 100 years ago. We take evolution theory as a fact, because it’s the theory that has been proven billions of times again and again, and we keep finding more proof for it. Just because we might not know everything yet, is not an argument against the only working theory we have.

          Your Christ illusion has been proven zero times

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can say its not handwaving, but as evolution currently stands it is an impossible theory. Until there is an actual explanation you can say its been “proven billions of times”.

            • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Until there is an actual explanation you can say its been “proven billions of times”

              All the evidence we have supports evolution theory

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Except for the very start of it, and unless you can answer that question it voids all of evolution.