• GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    For me, arm has already “won” this debacle – convenience > performance all day errday.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      ARM won the mobile/tablet form factor right from the start. Apple popularised ARM on the desktop. Amazon popularised ARM in the cloud.

      Intel’s been busy shitting out crap like the 13900K/14900K and pretending that ARM and RISC-V aren’t going to eat their lunch.

      The only beef I have with ARM systems is the typical SoC formula, I still want to build systems from off the shelf components.

      I can’t wait.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only beef I have with ARM systems is the typical SoC formula, I still want to build systems from off the shelf components.

        I’m here with you. ARM and RV could really go into standardization.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thinking about it, the SoC idea could stop at the southern boundary of the chipset in x86 systems.

          Include DDR memory controller, PCI controller, USB controllers, iGPU’s etc. most of those have migrated into x86 CPU’s now anyway (I remember having north and south bridge chipsets!)

          Leave the rest of the system: NIC’s, dGPU’s, etc on the relevant busses.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m both surprised and not surprised that ever since the M1, Intel seems to just be doing nothing in the consumer space. Certainly losing their contract with Apple was a blow to their sales, and with AMD doing pretty well these days, ARM slowly taking over the server space where backwards compatibility isn’t as significant, and now Qualcomm coming to eat the windows market, Intel just seems like a dying beast. Unless they do something magical, who will want an Intel processor in 5 years?

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I haven’t wanted an Intel processor for years. Their “innovation” is driven by marketing rather than technical prowess.

          The latest batch of 13900k and again with 14900k power envelope microcode bullshit was the final “last” straw.

          They were more interested in something they could brand as a competitor to ryzen. Then left everyone who bought one (and I bought three at work) holding the bag.

          We’ve not made the same mistake again.

          Intel dying and its corpse being consumed by its competitors is a fairy tale ending.

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I also haven’t wanted an Intel processor in a while . They used to be best in class for laptops prior to the M1, but they’re basically last now behind Apple, AMD, Qualcomm. They might win in a few specific benchmarks that matter very little to people, and are still the default option in most gaming laptops. For desktop use the Ryzen family is much more compelling. For servers they still seem to have an advantage but it’s also an industry which requires longer term contracts that Intel has the infrastructure for more so than it’s competitors, but ARM is also gaining ground there with exceptional performance per watt.