• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This sounds like a cool idea because it is a novel approach, and it appeals to my general heuristic of the inevitability of technology and freedom. However, I don’t think it’s actually a good idea. People are entitled privacy, on this I hope we agree – and I believe this is because of something more fundamental: people are entitled dignity. If you think we’ll reach a point in this lifetime where it will be too commonplace to be a threat to someone’s dignity, I just don’t agree.

    Not saying the solution is to ban the technology though.

    • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      When you put out photos of yourself on the internet you should expect anyone to find them and do whatever they want to them. If you aren’t expecting that, then you aren’t educated enough on how internet works and that’s what we should be working on. Social media is really bad for privacy and many people are not aware of it.

      Now if someone took a picture of you and then edited it without your consent, that is a different action and it’s a lot more serious offense.

      Either way, deepfakes are just an evolution of something that already existed before and isn’t going away anytime soon.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah I mean it’s just a more easy to use Photoshop basically.

        I agree people need to understand better the privacy risks of social media.

        When you put out photos of yourself on the internet you should expect anyone to find them and do whatever they want to them.

        Expect, yeah I guess. Doesn’t mean we should tolerate it. I expect murder to happen on a daily basis. People editing images of me on their own devices and keeping that to themself, that’s their business. But if they edit photos of me and proliferate, I think it becomes my business. Fortunately, there are no photos of me on the internet.

        Edit: I basically agree with you regarding text content. I’m not sure why I feel different about images of me. Maybe because it’s a fingerprint. I don’t mind so much people editing pictures I post that don’t include my face. Hmm.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah I mean it’s just a more easy to use Photoshop basically.

          Photoshop has the same technology baked into it now. Sure, it has “safeguards” so it may not generate nudes, but it would have no trouble depicting someone “having dinner with Bill Cosby” or whatever you feel is reputation destroying.

          • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Pretty sure they’re talking about generative AI created deepfakes being easier than manually cutting out someone’s face and pasting it on a photo of a naked person, not comparing Adobe’s AI to a different model.