You must log in or register to comment.
If you can’t get webN to work, just try again with webN+1.
Anyone declaring a new webN needs to be cast out of society tbh. Tarred and feathered, preferably.
Damn. Guess you’re not interested in my vision for Web5 then, huh? It’s a shame. I think an internet consisting exclusively of JS-free personal sites only accessible via IPoAC will really catch on.
I’m out because you used too many buzzwords that I actually understand and not enough that I don’t, especially ones that somehow trigger heartburn despite my lack of understanding
IPoAC
Thanks. I googled that and it was worth it.
One of today’s lucky 10.000 😄
Aw, I worked with David, not that many years after RFC 1149, and he was a nice guy. It makes me so happy it’s still a thing.
Fuck it, we’re going straight to Web5.
web69420
Big contender for “Worst Website Name Ever”
In contrast, Web4 identifies products consumers are willing to purchase and comprehends market requirements.
The crazy and hitherto-unheard-of concept of “selling things people actually want to buy to people who want to buy them”… It’ll never catch on!
(I mean, it will never catch on for crypto, because applying this philosophy to crypto quickly reveals that no one actually wants the thing they’re supposed to be selling)
