• HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, I fully agree there are multiple logistics and engineering challenges that would need to be overcome. But im also aware we are orders of magnitude more advanced than when Great Eastern was designed and built - we used to think we would never get to the moon because a spacecraft couldn’t carry enough coal.

    If you could eliminate 80% of fuel costs you could make smaller vessels much more cost effective which, let’s be honest, is the biggest hurdle. Make it sail 95% of the time, small maneuvering engine and electric tugs can eliminate alot of the variable costs… and they only cruise at 10-12kt anyway.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you could eliminate 80% of fuel costs you could make smaller vessels much more cost effective

      Ships don’t work that way. There are a couple of reasons other than fuel economy why they keep building them as big as they can:

      • Hull speed is proportional to waterline length. In other words, bigger ships can go faster.

      • Bigger ships have better economies of scale for the crew.

      Also, winds aren’t reliable enough for any ship to sail 95% of the time, unless you count being becalmed as “sailing.”